These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481583)
1. Wear resistance of isosit and polymethyl methacrylate occlusal splint material. Schulte JK; Anderson GC; Sakaguchi RL; DeLong R Dent Mater; 1987 Apr; 3(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 3481583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel. Ratledge DK; Smith BG; Wilson RF J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 7932268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. Lutz F; Krejci I; Barbakow F J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 71(8):1525-9. PubMed ID: 1506518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. Krejci I; Lutz F; Gautschi L J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 7965895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical and experimental research of abrasion resistance of Isosit with special reference to the problem of abrasion testing (I)]. Weber H Quintessenz; 1980 Jan; 31(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 6952299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins. Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E Dent Mater; 1992 May; 8(3):146-8. PubMed ID: 1387854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical and experimental investigations on the question of abrasion resistance of Isosit with special reference to the problem of abrasion testing (II)]. Weber H Quintessenz; 1980 Feb; 31(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 6952333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers. Stober T; Henninger M; Schmitter M; Pritsch M; Rammelsberg P J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 20141815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials. Reyes-Sevilla M; Kuijs RH; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Lobbezoo F J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):539-544. PubMed ID: 29663496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. Yesil ZD; Alapati S; Johnston W; Seghi RR J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18514665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study. Borg H; Azer SS; El Hadary A; Helaly O; Shoeib A; Hassan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):743.e1-743.e6. PubMed ID: 37743141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wear of dental tissues and materials. Craig RG; Powers JM Int Dent J; 1976 Jun; 26(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 786897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear]. Schmidlin PR; Pasqualetti T; Imfeld T; Besek M Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The continued in vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resins. Mitchem JC; Gronas DG J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Dec; 111(6):961-4. PubMed ID: 2933440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]