These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481588)

  • 1. Conservative preparation designs for Class II amalgam restorations.
    Sturdevant JR; Taylor DF; Leonard RH; Straka WF; Roberson TM; Wilder AD
    Dent Mater; 1987 Jun; 3(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 3481588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Class II cavity for amalgam. Proposed new modifications related to material characteristics].
    Riccio C; Piccirillo P; Belnome G; Serpico R
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990; 31(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 2100480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations.
    Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Boksman L
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The clinical evaluation of amalgam alloys.
    Jacobsen PH
    Br Dent J; 1984 Dec; 157(12):436-9. PubMed ID: 6397217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental materials--what goes where? Class I and II cavities.
    Burke FJ; Mackenzie L; Sands P
    Dent Update; 2013 May; 40(4):260-2, 264-6, 269-70 passim. PubMed ID: 23829006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration of primary teeth with amalgam.
    Mathewson RJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Jan; 28(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 6584342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonded amalgam restorations: current research and clinical procedure.
    Staninec M; Setcos JC
    Dent Update; 2003 Oct; 30(8):430-4, 436. PubMed ID: 14619732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 8708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Failure of the amalgam fillings. When and why].
    Douvitsas GP
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1982; 36(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 6820969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of axiopulpal line angle and proximal retention on fracture strength of amalgam restorations.
    Amorim A; de Lima Navarro MF; Mondelli J; Lopes ES
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Aug; 40(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 278834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
    Ottenga ME; Mjör I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.