199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34815919)
1. Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).
Yuan M; Wu J; Austin RE; Hofer SOP; Lista F; Ahmad J
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e3897. PubMed ID: 34815919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR.
Yuan M; Wu J; Austin RE; Lista F; Ahmad J
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2021 Sep; 3(3):ojab020. PubMed ID: 34240051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.
Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 37420161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on direct oral anticoagulants in the past 5 years.
Eshaghpour A; Li A; Javidan AP; Chen N; Yang S; Crowther MA
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 32493834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with meta-analyses focusing on traumatic dental injuries: A cross-sectional study.
Nagendrababu V; Faggion CM; Gopinath VK; Narasimhan S; Duncan HF; Levin L; Abbott PV; Dummer PMH
Dent Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 39(6):637-646. PubMed ID: 37594908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review.
Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.
Cullis PS; Gudlaugsdottir K; Andrews J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175213. PubMed ID: 28384296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.
Belloti JC; Okamura A; Scheeren J; Faloppa F; Ynoe de Moraes V
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tonsillar-related pathologies: An analysis of the evidence underpinning management recommendations.
Torgerson T; Rucker B; Nowlin R; Curry S; Cooper C; Vassar M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jan; 152():110992. PubMed ID: 34883327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology.
Wasiak J; Shen AY; Ware R; O'Donohoe TJ; Faggion CM
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2017 Oct; 42(8):852-856. PubMed ID: 28610464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
Zheng Q; Lai F; Li B; Xu J; Long J; Peng S; Li Y; Liu Y; Xiao H
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():639652. PubMed ID: 34262914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.
Downie LE; Makrai E; Bonggotgetsakul Y; Dirito LJ; Kristo K; Pham MN; You M; Verspoor K; Pianta MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 29978192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
