These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481598)

  • 1. A study design for an in vivo investigation of marginal fracture in amalgam restorations.
    Marker VA; McKinney TW; Filler WH; Miller BH; Mitchell RJ; Okabe T
    Dent Mater; 1987 Dec; 3(6):322-30. PubMed ID: 3481598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of surface treatment and thermal stress on the adaptation of Germadent amalgam fillings].
    Weiland M; Ullrich B; Borrmann S
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1989; 77(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 2526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tarnish, corrosion, marginal fracture, and creep of amalgam restorations: a two-year clinical study.
    Letzel H; Aardening CJ; Fick JM; van Leusen J; Vrijhoef MM
    Oper Dent; 1978; 3(3):82-92. PubMed ID: 296379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal integrity of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Tarim B; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Cox CF
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 9522690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach.
    Aboushelib MN; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 18926566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Marginal fracture of amalgam restoration in deciduous teeth. 2. Marginal angles of amalgam restorations in deciduous anterior teeth].
    Yakushiji M; Imanishi T; Machida Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1970 Jan; 70(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 5264493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis and design of single restorations and fixed bridges.
    Craig RG; Farah JW
    Oral Sci Rev; 1977; 10():45-74. PubMed ID: 335306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical assessments of dental amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Marantz RL
    Int Dent J; 1980 Dec; 30(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 6935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Marginal fracture of amalgam restoration].
    Wakumoto S
    Nihon Shika Ishikai Zasshi; 1983; 36(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 6589304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.