These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34815988)

  • 1.
    Li J; Krall M; Trummer F; Memon AR; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Jin Y; Chen X; Deutschmann H; Zefferer U; Schäfer U; Campe GV; Egger J
    Data Brief; 2021 Dec; 39():107524. PubMed ID: 34815988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic skull defect restoration and cranial implant generation for cranioplasty.
    Li J; von Campe G; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Wang E; Chen X; Zefferer U; Tödtling M; Krall M; Deutschmann H; Schäfer U; Schmalstieg D; Egger J
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102171. PubMed ID: 34340106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants-what should automated methods strive to replicate?
    Fishman Z; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn O; Hardisty M; Whyne CM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 38430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Kodym O; Li J; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Chilamkurthy S; Egger J; Španěl M
    Data Brief; 2021 Apr; 35():106902. PubMed ID: 33997188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards clinical applicability and computational efficiency in automatic cranial implant design: An overview of the AutoImplant 2021 cranial implant design challenge.
    Li J; Ellis DG; Kodym O; Rauschenbach L; Rieß C; Sure U; Wrede KH; Alvarez CM; Wodzinski M; Daniol M; Hemmerling D; Mahdi H; Clement A; Kim E; Fishman Z; Whyne CM; Mainprize JG; Hardisty MR; Pathak S; Sindhura C; Gorthi RKSS; Kiran DV; Gorthi S; Yang B; Fang K; Li X; Kroviakov A; Yu L; Jin Y; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Herout A; Alves V; Španěl M; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J
    Med Image Anal; 2023 Aug; 88():102865. PubMed ID: 37331241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep learning for cranioplasty in clinical practice: Going from synthetic to real patient data.
    Kodym O; Španěl M; Herout A
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104766. PubMed ID: 34425418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual surgical planning and CAD/CAM in the treatment of cranial defects.
    Winder J; McRitchie I; McKnight W; Cooke S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():599-601. PubMed ID: 15718805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomically constrained deformation for design of cranial implant: methodology and validation.
    Wu T; Engelhardt M; Fieten L; Popovic A; Radermacher K
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17354868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional deep learning to automatically generate cranial implant geometry.
    Wu CT; Yang YH; Chang YZ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2683. PubMed ID: 35177704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates.
    Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Research on three-dimensional skull repair by combining residual and informer attention].
    Qin C; Zeng J; Zheng B; Zeng J; Zhai Y; Zhang W; Yan J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 39(5):897-908. PubMed ID: 36310478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM-manipulated CT-data.
    Eufinger H; Wehmöller M; Machtens E; Heuser L; Harders A; Kruse D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Jun; 23(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7673445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design.
    Li J; Gsaxner C; Pepe A; Morais A; Alves V; von Campe G; Wallner J; Egger J
    Sci Data; 2021 Jan; 8(1):36. PubMed ID: 33514740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A statistical shape modeling approach for predicting subject-specific human skull from head surface.
    Nguyen TN; Tran VD; Nguyen HQ; Dao TT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Oct; 58(10):2355-2373. PubMed ID: 32710378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Back to the Roots: Reconstructing Large and Complex Cranial Defects using an Image-based Statistical Shape Model.
    Li J; Ellis DG; Pepe A; Gsaxner C; Aizenberg MR; Kleesiek J; Egger J
    J Med Syst; 2024 May; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 38780820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymere (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique.
    Saringer W; Nöbauer-Huhmann I; Knosp E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Nov; 144(11):1193-203. PubMed ID: 12434176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breaking the mold: telescoping drives the evolution of more integrated and heterogeneous skulls in cetaceans.
    Buono MR; Vlachos E
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13392. PubMed ID: 35539009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating high-resolution 3D cranial implant geometry using deep learning techniques.
    Wu CT; Yang YH; Chang YZ
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1297933. PubMed ID: 38149174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep learning-based framework for automatic cranial defect reconstruction and implant modeling.
    Wodzinski M; Daniol M; Socha M; Hemmerling D; Stanuch M; Skalski A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107173. PubMed ID: 36257198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transmission of bone strain in the craniofacial bones of edentulous human skulls upon dental implant loading.
    Yacoub N; Ismail YH; Mao JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Aug; 88(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 12397247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.