These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The role of working memory in probabilistic cuing of visual search. Giménez-Fernández T; Vicente-Conesa F; Luque D; Vadillo MA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 36326649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Looking away to see: The acquisition of a search habit away from the saccade direction. Chen C; Lee VG Vision Res; 2023 Oct; 211():108276. PubMed ID: 37356376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors. Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. Beesley T; Vadillo MA; Pearson D; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 24999706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Habit-like attentional bias is unlike goal-driven attentional bias against spatial updating. Hong I; Kim MS Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jun; 7(1):50. PubMed ID: 35713814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of spatial and feature probability cuing in visual search. Schwark J; Dolgov I Perception; 2013; 42(4):470-2. PubMed ID: 23866559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. Brady TF; Chun MM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):798-815. PubMed ID: 17683229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing. Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Won BY; Cistera JD; Rosenbaum GM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 25113853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? Kunar MA; Flusberg S; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 17683230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. There is more to contextual cuing than meets the eye: Improving visual search without attentional guidance toward predictable target locations. Vadillo MA; Giménez-Fernández T; Beesley T; Shanks DR; Luque D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jan; 47(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 33180547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional guidance by target-location probability cueing is largely inflexible, long-lasting, and distinct from inter-trial priming. Golan A; Lamy D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Feb; 50(2):244-265. PubMed ID: 36972107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional modulation of visual processing in adult dyslexia: a spatial-cuing deficit. Roach NW; Hogben JH Psychol Sci; 2004 Oct; 15(10):650-4. PubMed ID: 15447634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial cueing effects are not what we thought: On the timing of attentional deployment. Yaron I; Lamy D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jul; 47(7):946-962. PubMed ID: 34424025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]