These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34816642)

  • 41. [Reasonability of accounting for gender in intraocular lens power calculation].
    Belov DF; Nikolaenko VP; Nizametdinova YS
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2023; 139(5):68-72. PubMed ID: 37942599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Balducci N; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 32050229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of new-generation intraocular lens calculation formulas in eyes with variations in predicted refraction.
    Chang P; Qian S; Wang Y; Li S; Yang F; Hu Y; Liu Z; Zhao YE
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 261(1):127-135. PubMed ID: 35802204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of intraocular lens power formulas for eyes with scleral-sutured intraocular lenses in congenital ectopia lentis.
    Lian Z; Cao Q; Qi H; Young CA; Zhang X; Jin G; Zheng D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Apr; 48(4):469-474. PubMed ID: 34978783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the accuracy of six intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes of axial length exceeding 25.0mm.
    Stopyra W
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 Nov; 44(9):1332-1339. PubMed ID: 34531068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of patient age on some new and older IOL power calculation formulas.
    Sella R; Reitblat O; Durnford KM; Pettey JH; Olson RJ; Hahn TE; Bernhisel AA; Afshari NA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 102(5):e696-e704. PubMed ID: 38155407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
    Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modified intraocular lens power selection method according to biometric subgroups Eom IOL power calculator.
    Eom Y; Bae SH; Yang SK; Kim DH; Song JS; Cooke DL
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4228. PubMed ID: 38378801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang Q; Jiang W; Lin T; Zhu Y; Chen C; Lin H; Chen W
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 46(7):738-749. PubMed ID: 29498180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Patients Undergoing Combined Phakic Intraocular Lens Removal and Cataract Surgery.
    Zhang J; Xia Z; Han X; Liu Z; Lin H; Qiu X; Zhang M; Ruan X; Chen X; Jin G; Gu X; Tan X; Luo L; Liu Y
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 234():241-249. PubMed ID: 34624249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients.
    Lin L; Fang J; Sun W; Gu S; Xu L; Chen S; Chang P; Zhao YE
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 261(4):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 36385570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in High Myopia.
    Bernardes J; Raimundo M; Lobo C; Murta JN
    J Refract Surg; 2021 Mar; 37(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 34038295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparing the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes: a meta-analysis.
    Li H; Ye Z; Luo Y; Li Z
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):619-633. PubMed ID: 36063246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Challenges in pediatric cataract surgery: comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using optical biometry.
    Yılmaz İE; Kimyon S; Mete A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):3071-3077. PubMed ID: 35362808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Accuracy of refractive outcomes using standard or total keratometry for intraocular lens power formulas in conventional cataract surgery.
    Zhao H; Chen X; Liu B; Liu X; Liu Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):346. PubMed ID: 37544987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. THE EXACTNESS OF INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION FORMULAS FOR SHORT EYES AND CORRELATION BETWEEN METHOD ACCURACY AND EYEBALL AXIAL LENGTH.
    Stopyra W
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2022; 78(5):236-240. PubMed ID: 36220363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible].
    Belov DF; Danilenko EV; Nikolaenko VP; Potemkin VV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2024; 140(2):34-39. PubMed ID: 38742496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prospective comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in phacovitrectomy: a pilot study in a real-world clinical practice.
    Sato T; Iimori E; Hayashi K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 261(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 35876885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal.
    Hou Y; Liu L; Wang G; Xie J; Wang Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):74. PubMed ID: 35151281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.