179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34816800)
21. [Ten Years from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Were the Predicted Effects Reported by Worldwide Experts Correct?].
Yasuda H
Igaku Butsuri; 2021; 41(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 34744123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. From a policy perspective: what is at stake?
Ban N
Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):147-152. PubMed ID: 34256576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident on the Use of Computed Tomography in Children With Mild Head Injuries.
Aso S; Matsui H; Yasunaga H
J Epidemiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):542-546. PubMed ID: 31813894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transuranic nuclides Pu, Am and Cm isotopes, and
Yamada M; Oikawa S; Shirotani Y; Kusakabe M; Shindo K
J Environ Radioact; 2021 Feb; 227():106459. PubMed ID: 33221564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation-related anxiety among public health nurses in the Fukushima Prefecture after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: a cross-sectional study.
Yoshida K; Orita M; Goto A; Kumagai A; Yasui K; Ohtsuru A; Hayashida N; Kudo T; Yamashita S; Takamura N
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e013564. PubMed ID: 27798037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk Perception of Health Risks Associated with Radiation Exposure among Residents of Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture.
Oishi K; Orita M; Taira Y; Kashiwazaki Y; Matsunaga H; Takamura N
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(24):. PubMed ID: 34948816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal and spatial variations of radioactive cesium levels in Northeast Japan following the Fukushima nuclear accident.
Arai T
Ecotoxicology; 2016 Oct; 25(8):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 27619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The institutional structure for decommissioning Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
Yamana H
Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):15-23. PubMed ID: 34261363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Simple Survey of the Preparation Situation for Resident's Evacuation in Japanese Prefectures After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
Tsujiguchi T; Sakamoto M; Koiwa T; Suzuki Y; Ogura K; Ito K; Yamanouchi K; Kashiwakura I
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():496716. PubMed ID: 33123507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Communicating With Residents About Risks Following the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
Murakami M; Sato A; Matsui S; Goto A; Kumagai A; Tsubokura M; Orita M; Takamura N; Kuroda Y; Ochi S
Asia Pac J Public Health; 2017 Mar; 29(2_suppl):74S-89S. PubMed ID: 28330403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lingering health-related anxiety about radiation among Fukushima residents as correlated with media information following the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.
Nakayama C; Sato O; Sugita M; Nakayama T; Kuroda Y; Orui M; Iwasa H; Yasumura S; Rudd RE
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217285. PubMed ID: 31150483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experience and current issues with recovery management from the Fukushima accident.
Kai M
Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):153-61. PubMed ID: 25816269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Post-crisis efforts towards recovery and resilience after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
Yamashita S; Takamura N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 45(8):700-7. PubMed ID: 26059007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors Associated with Refraining from Purchasing Foods Produced in Affected Areas after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident.
Yamaguchi T; Horiguchi I; Kunugita N
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35329065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Comparison with the Chernobyl Accident.
Yamashita S; Takamura N; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 27473699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Four and a half years of experience of a clinician born and raised in Fukushima: discrepancy found through dialogues and practices.
Miyazaki M
Ann ICRP; 2016 Dec; 45(2_suppl):23-32. PubMed ID: 28054490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture--a preliminary review of current plans.
Akiba S
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22327057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk perception of internal and external radiation exposure among administration staff affected by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
Matsunaga H; Kashiwazaki Y; Orita M; Taira Y; Takamura N
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Jul; 248():106869. PubMed ID: 35364432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Diversity of Concerns in Recovery after a Nuclear Accident: A Perspective from Fukushima.
Sato A; Lyamzina Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29462905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. "Living in Contaminated Areas"-Consideration of Different Perspectives.
Abend M; Nisbet A; Gering F; Averin V; Andersson K; Schneider T; Mothersill C; Zeeb H; Scholz-Kreisel P; Yamashita S; Pölz-Viol C; Port M
Health Phys; 2020 Jul; 119(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 32205714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
