BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3481796)

  • 1. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals.
    Reynolds MA; Madison S; Walton RE; Krell KV; Rittman BR
    J Endod; 1987 Jul; 13(7):307-14. PubMed ID: 3481796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison study to quantitate the debridement ability of hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Stamos DE; Sadeghi EM; Haasch GC; Gerstein H
    J Endod; 1987 Sep; 13(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 3482102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of endosonic instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Kielt LW; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1987 May; 13(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 3473177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cleansing and shaping of curved canals: S.E.M. evaluation of an ultrasonic endodontic instrument].
    Pagavino G; Pace R; Ciabattini G
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 2485788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experimental study of canal trajectory using sonic instruments].
    Cochet JY; Barril I; Laurichesse JM
    Rev Fr Endod; 1986 Sep; 5(3):21-31. PubMed ID: 3474732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes.
    Lev R; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):523-30. PubMed ID: 3482096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irrigation patterns during ultrasonic canal instrumentation. Part I. K-type files.
    Krell KV; Johnson RJ; Madison S
    J Endod; 1988 Feb; 14(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 3162941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on the shape of curved root canals.
    Tang MP; Stock CJ
    Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 2599662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
    Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR; Crum LA; Walton AJ
    J Endod; 1988 Oct; 14(10):486-93. PubMed ID: 3255774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison using macroradiography of canal shapes in teeth instrumented ultrasonically and by hand.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Aug; 15(8):339-44. PubMed ID: 2637324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
    Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [SEM study of the surface conditions after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic canal preparation].
    Ciucchi B; Dietschi JM; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1693-7. PubMed ID: 3462142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative SEM study of the shape of the canal after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic preparation].
    Dietschi J; Ciucchi B; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1687-91. PubMed ID: 3462141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris.
    Fairbourn DR; McWalter GM; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):102-8. PubMed ID: 3471831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Histological evaluation of the efficiency of manual or ultrasonic instrumentation in upper molars (curved or twisted wide and narrow canals)].
    Esberard RM; Utrilla LS
    Odontol Clin; 1988; 2(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3267794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power vs. hand instrumentation in endodontics.
    Luks S
    N Y State Dent J; 1986; 52(6):27-9. PubMed ID: 3459975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of canal shape following hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Hartwell GR
    J Endod; 1989 Sep; 15(9):417-21. PubMed ID: 2637335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.