These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34817965)

  • 1. Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Gurgan S
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Dec; 23(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 34817965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follow-up of flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive system in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized, controlled 24-month clinical trial.
    Kemaloğlu H; Atalayin Ozkaya C; Ergucu Z; Onal B
    Am J Dent; 2020 Feb; 33(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 32056414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sixty-month follow up of three different universal adhesives used with a highly-filled flowable resin composite in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesion.
    Oz FD; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5377-5387. PubMed ID: 35477817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study.
    Sengar EV; Mulay S; Beri L; Gupta A; Almohareb T; Binalrimal S; Robaian A; Bahammam MA; Bahammam HA; Bahammam SA; Zidane B; Albar NH; Bhandi S; Shrivastava D; Srivastava KC; Patil S
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jul; 15(14):. PubMed ID: 35888429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.
    Oz FD; Kutuk ZB; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 30109443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
    Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Performance of a "No Wait" Universal Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Two-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Oz FD; Dursun MN; Ergin E
    J Adhes Dent; 2022 Aug; 24(1):313-323. PubMed ID: 35980240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-adhesive flowable composite resins and flowable composite resins in permanent teeth with occlusal cavities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu X; Zhang R; Yu X; Hua F; Zhang L; Chen Z
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104691. PubMed ID: 37683798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Oz FD; Ergin E; Cakir FY; Gurgan S
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2020 Mar; 54(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 32523153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An
    Meshram P; Meshram V; Palve D; Patil S; Gade V; Raut A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of a one-step, self-etch adhesive with and without an intermediary layer of a flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.
    Boeckler A; Schaller HG; Gernhardt CR
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Apr; 43(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22532941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Lopes LS; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Matos TP; Reis A; Calixto AL; Loguercio AD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4337-4350. PubMed ID: 35142923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 24-Month Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive on Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Self-Etch and Etch-and-Rinse Techniques.
    Cruz J; Silva AL; Eira R; Coito C; Sousa BR; Lopes MM; Cavalheiro A
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Oct; 23(5):379-387. PubMed ID: 34549921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Oz FD; Ergin E; Canatan S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180358. PubMed ID: 30994773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of a two-step self-etching vs two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive and SEM margin analysis: four-year results.
    Boeckler A; Boeckler L; Eppendorf K; Schaller HG; Gernhardt CR
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 22724115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.