148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34818144)
1. Outcomes of Positive and Suspicious Findings in Clinical Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening and the Road Ahead.
Regis SM; Borondy-Kitts A; McKee AB; Rieger-Christ K; Sands J; Afnan J; McKee BJ
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1371-1378. PubMed ID: 34818144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for Reducing False-Positive Screening Results for Intermediate-Size Nodules Evaluated Using Lung-RADS: A Secondary Analysis of National Lung Screening Trial Data.
Hammer MM; Hunsaker AR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 35319912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lung-RADS Category 3 and 4 Nodules on Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.
Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Som A; Wu MY; Park EY; Zhang EW; Archer JM; McDermott S; Khandekar M; Lanuti M; Gainor JF; Lennes IT; Shepard JO; Digumarthy SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 35080453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rate of benign nodule resection in a lung cancer screening program.
El Alam R; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Clin Imaging; 2023 Dec; 104():109984. PubMed ID: 37832324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterizing Lung-RADS category 4 lesions in a university lung cancer screening program.
Kocher Wulfeck M; Plesner S; Herndon JE; Christensen JD; Patz EF
Lung Cancer; 2023 Dec; 186():107420. PubMed ID: 37956610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Real-World Lung Cancer CT Screening Performance, Smoking Behavior, and Adherence to Recommendations: Lung-RADS Category and Smoking Status Predict Adherence.
Barbosa EJM; Yang R; Hershman M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 32755178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Management and Outcomes of Suspected Infectious and Inflammatory Lung Abnormalities Identified on Lung Cancer Screening CT.
Mendoza DP; Chintanapakdee W; Zhang EW; Gilman MD; Lennes IT; Frank AJ; Shepard JO; Digumarthy SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 33377416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: Baseline Screening Results in Shanghai.
Fan L; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Li Q; Yang W; Wang S; Shan F; Zhang X; Shi J; Chen W; Liu SY
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 30554839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. NCCN Guidelines as a Model of Extended Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening.
McKee BJ; Regis S; Borondy-Kitts AK; Hashim JA; French RJ; Wald C; McKee AB
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Apr; 16(4):444-449. PubMed ID: 29632062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics and Outcomes of Lung Cancers Detected on Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening CT.
Zhang EW; Shepard JO; Kuo A; Chintanapakdee W; Keane F; Gainor JF; Mino-Kenudson M; Lanuti M; Lennes IT; Digumarthy SR
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 34108138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of radiation dose reduction on computer-aided detection (CAD) performance in a low-dose lung cancer screening population.
Young S; Lo P; Kim G; Brown M; Hoffman J; Hsu W; Wahi-Anwar W; Flores C; Lee G; Noo F; Goldin J; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 28122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.
Silva M; Milanese G; Sestini S; Sabia F; Jacobs C; van Ginneken B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Marchianò A; Sverzellati N; Pastorino U
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1956-1968. PubMed ID: 32997182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study.
Henschke CI; Yip R; Yankelevitz DF; Smith JP;
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 158(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 23420233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delays in Recommended Follow-Up after Positive Findings in Lung Cancer Screening.
Ahmed A; Hippe DS; Snidarich M; Crothers K; Triplette M
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2023 Aug; 20(8):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 36973008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lung cancer screening with MRI: Evaluation of MRI for lung cancer screening by comparison of LDCT- and MRI-derived Lung-RADS categories in the first two screening rounds.
Meier-Schroers M; Homsi R; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Thomas D
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):898-905. PubMed ID: 29992387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals.
Heuvelmans MA; Oudkerk M; de Bock GH; de Koning HJ; Xie X; van Ooijen PM; Greuter MJ; de Jong PA; Groen HJ; Vliegenthart R
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1836-45. PubMed ID: 23508275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invasive Procedures Associated With Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.
Manyak A; Seaburg L; Bohreer K; Kirtland SH; Hubka M; Gerbino AJ
Chest; 2023 Aug; 164(2):544-555. PubMed ID: 36781101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting Lung Cancer Screening CTs: Practical Approach to Lung Cancer Screening and Application of Lung-RADS.
Jhala K; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Clin Chest Med; 2024 Jun; 45(2):279-293. PubMed ID: 38816088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening.
Manos D; Seely JM; Taylor J; Borgaonkar J; Roberts HC; Mayo JR
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 May; 65(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 24758919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary Results of Lung Cancer Screening in a Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Population.
Guichet PL; Liu BY; Desai B; Surani Z; Cen SY; Lee C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 29166147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
