114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34818262)
1. A Prospective Study Comparing Cancer Detection Rates of Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Performed by Junior Urologists versus a Senior Consultant in a Real-World Setting.
Song JA; He BM; Li HS; Yu XW; Shi ZK; Ren GY; Chen H; Gao X; Wang LH; Xu CL; Zeng SX; Wang HF
Urol Int; 2022; 106(9):884-890. PubMed ID: 34818262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy.
Tschirdewahn S; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Püllen L; Reis H; Panic A; Kesch C; Darr C; Heß J; Giganti F; Moore CM; Guberina N; Forsting M; Wetter A; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1300-1307. PubMed ID: 32660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
Song G; Ruan M; Wang H; Fan Y; He Q; Lin Z; Li X; Li P; Wang X; He Z; Zhou L
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32716686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):108-117. PubMed ID: 34428091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of systematic prostate biopsies when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with needle tracking-what is the additional value?
Günzel K; Magheli A; Busch J; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Edler D; Schostak M; Borgmann H; Schlegel J; Hinz S
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 35877030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface-projection-based transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate: an original technique with a good cancer detection rate.
Wang L; Wang X; Zhao W; Zhao Z; Li Z; Fei S; Zhu H; Ji X; Yang B; Li N; Na Y
BMC Urol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):107. PubMed ID: 31684917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 4: Transperineal Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy Using Local Anesthesia.
Immerzeel J; Israël B; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Kurth KH; de Reijke T; Sedelaar M; Debruyne F; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2022 Jan; 81(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 34799197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.
Preisser F; Theissen L; Wenzel M; Humke C; Bodelle B; Köllermann J; Kluth L; Banek S; Becker A; Roos F; Chun FK; Mandel P
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 31296485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate: preliminary results of a prospective single-centre study.
Junker D; Schäfer G; Heidegger I; Bektic J; Ladurner M; Jaschke W; Aigner F
Urol Int; 2015; 94(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 25591786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.
Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
