248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34818430)
1. Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.
Beal MA; Gagne M; Kulkarni SA; Patlewicz G; Thomas RS; Barton-Maclaren TS
ALTEX; 2022; 39(1):123-139. PubMed ID: 34818430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing.
Wetmore BA; Wambaugh JF; Allen B; Ferguson SS; Sochaski MA; Setzer RW; Houck KA; Strope CL; Cantwell K; Judson RS; LeCluyse E; Clewell HJ; Thomas RS; Andersen ME
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Nov; 148(1):121-36. PubMed ID: 26251325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing Toxicokinetic Uncertainty and Variability in Risk Prioritization.
Wambaugh JF; Wetmore BA; Ring CL; Nicolas CI; Pearce RG; Honda GS; Dinallo R; Angus D; Gilbert J; Sierra T; Badrinarayanan A; Snodgrass B; Brockman A; Strock C; Setzer RW; Thomas RS
Toxicol Sci; 2019 Dec; 172(2):235-251. PubMed ID: 31532498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. httk: R Package for High-Throughput Toxicokinetics.
Pearce RG; Setzer RW; Strope CL; Wambaugh JF; Sipes NS
J Stat Softw; 2017 Jul; 79(4):1-26. PubMed ID: 30220889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-throughput PBTK models for
Breen M; Ring CL; Kreutz A; Goldsmith MR; Wambaugh JF
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):903-921. PubMed ID: 34056988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-throughput screening tools facilitate calculation of a combined exposure-bioactivity index for chemicals with endocrine activity.
Wegner SH; Pinto CL; Ring CL; Wambaugh JF
Environ Int; 2020 Apr; 137():105470. PubMed ID: 32050122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive modeling of biological responses in the rat liver using
Ring C; Sipes NS; Hsieh JH; Carberry C; Koval LE; Klaren WD; Harris MA; Auerbach SS; Rager JE
Comput Toxicol; 2021 May; 18():. PubMed ID: 34013136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of computational toxicology tools to predict
Silva M; Kwok RK
Curr Res Toxicol; 2022; 3():100064. PubMed ID: 35243363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.
Paul Friedman K; Gagne M; Loo LH; Karamertzanis P; Netzeva T; Sobanski T; Franzosa JA; Richard AM; Lougee RR; Gissi A; Lee JJ; Angrish M; Dorne JL; Foster S; Raffaele K; Bahadori T; Gwinn MR; Lambert J; Whelan M; Rasenberg M; Barton-Maclaren T; Thomas RS
Toxicol Sci; 2020 Jan; 173(1):202-225. PubMed ID: 31532525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of computational toxicology models to predict toxicological points of departure: A case study with triazine herbicides.
Silva M; Kwok RK
Birth Defects Res; 2023 Mar; 115(5):525-544. PubMed ID: 36584090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposure forecasting - ExpoCast - for data-poor chemicals in commerce and the environment.
Wambaugh JF; Rager JE
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):783-793. PubMed ID: 36347934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From vision toward best practices: Evaluating
Reardon AJF; Farmahin R; Williams A; Meier MJ; Addicks GC; Yauk CL; Matteo G; Atlas E; Harrill J; Everett LJ; Shah I; Judson R; Ramaiahgari S; Ferguson SS; Barton-Maclaren TS
Front Toxicol; 2023; 5():1194895. PubMed ID: 37288009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability.
Ring CL; Pearce RG; Setzer RW; Wetmore BA; Wambaugh JF
Environ Int; 2017 Sep; 106():105-118. PubMed ID: 28628784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo toxicity benchmarks suggests a role for ToxCast data in ecological hazard assessment.
Schaupp CM; Maloney EM; Mattingly KZ; Olker JH; Villeneuve DL
Toxicol Sci; 2023 Sep; 195(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 37490521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The chemical landscape of high-throughput new approach methodologies for exposure.
Isaacs KK; Egeghy P; Dionisio KL; Phillips KA; Zidek A; Ring C; Sobus JR; Ulrich EM; Wetmore BA; Williams AJ; Wambaugh JF
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):820-832. PubMed ID: 36435938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals.
Wambaugh JF; Wetmore BA; Pearce R; Strope C; Goldsmith R; Sluka JP; Sedykh A; Tropsha A; Bosgra S; Shah I; Judson R; Thomas RS; Setzer RW
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Sep; 147(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26085347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
Kavlock R; Dix D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of ToxCast/Tox21 data for toxicity mechanism-based evaluation and prioritization of environmental chemicals: Perspective and limitations.
Jeong J; Kim D; Choi J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2022 Oct; 84():105451. PubMed ID: 35921976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infer the in vivo point of departure with ToxCast in vitro assay data using a robust learning approach.
Wang D
Arch Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 92(9):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 29995190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of food-relevant chemicals in the ToxCast high-throughput screening program.
Karmaus AL; Filer DL; Martin MT; Houck KA
Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Jun; 92():188-96. PubMed ID: 27103583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
