These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34818450)
1. Impact of incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging in FIGO Staging of Primary Carcinoma Cervix: Experience from a tertiary cancer center. Mohan N; V J; Prahladan A; K R Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2022 Aug; 18(4):465-472. PubMed ID: 34818450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management. Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings. Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study. Knoth J; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Fokdal L; Sturdza A; Hoskin P; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Wiebe E; Rai B; Cooper R; van der Steen-Banasik E; van Limbergen E; Pieters BR; Sundset M; Tan LT; Nout RA; Tanderup K; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 32798000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI. Merz J; Bossart M; Bamberg F; Eisenblaetter M Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 32731266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Study between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical FIGO Criteria in Different Stages of Carcinoma Cervix. Zubery MH; Rahman FB; Islam MN; Datta A; Rahman T; Mahdi R Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 34605487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls. Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incremental prognostic value of MRI in the staging of early cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature. Bourgioti C; Chatoupis K; Rodolakis A; Antoniou A; Tzavara C; Koutoulidis V; Moulopoulos LA Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 26459788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer. Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009. Zhang Y; Ding J; Hua K J Int Med Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):3000605211067397. PubMed ID: 34986672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term Outcomes of MRI Stage IIB Cervical Cancer. Yoon A; Park JJ; Park BK; Lee YY; Paik ES; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Kim CK; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1252-7. PubMed ID: 27284726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of MRI in the management and staging of cancer of the uterine cervix. Stenstedt K; Hellström AC; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L Acta Oncol; 2011 Apr; 50(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 21166605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer. Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI-based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer. Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Halle MK; Forsse D; Trovik J; Smit N; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6444-6455. PubMed ID: 35332408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer. Kido A; Nakamoto Y Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20201342. PubMed ID: 33989030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ; J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carcinoma of the cervix: role of MR imaging. Chiang SH; Quek ST Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Jul; 32(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 12968563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]