These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34819031)

  • 1. Benchmarking different approaches for Norovirus genome assembly in metagenome samples.
    Fuentes-Trillo A; Monzó C; Manzano I; Santiso-Bellón C; Andrade JDSR; Gozalbo-Rovira R; García-García AB; Rodríguez-Díaz J; Chaves FJ
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):849. PubMed ID: 34819031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
    Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices.
    Li D; Luo R; Liu CM; Leung CM; Ting HF; Sadakane K; Yamashita H; Lam TW
    Methods; 2016 Jun; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 27012178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarking and Assessment of Eight
    Gupta AK; Kumar M
    OMICS; 2022 Jul; 26(7):372-381. PubMed ID: 35759429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of de-novo assembly tools for plasmid metagenome analysis.
    Gupta SK; Raza S; Unno T
    Genes Genomics; 2019 Sep; 41(9):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 31187446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MetaVelvet-DL: a MetaVelvet deep learning extension for de novo metagenome assembly.
    Liang KC; Sakakibara Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 22(Suppl 6):427. PubMed ID: 34078257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
    Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.
    Fritz A; Hofmann P; Majda S; Dahms E; Dröge J; Fiedler J; Lesker TR; Belmann P; DeMaere MZ; Darling AE; Sczyrba A; Bremges A; McHardy AC
    Microbiome; 2019 Feb; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30736849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly.
    Charuvaka A; Rangwala H
    BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. PubMed ID: 21989307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LMAS: evaluating metagenomic short de novo assembly methods through defined communities.
    Mendes CI; Vila-Cerqueira P; Motro Y; Moran-Gilad J; Carriço JA; Ramirez M
    Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 36576131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of urban microbiome assemblies with the help of targeted in silico gold standards.
    Gerner SM; Rattei T; Graf AB
    Biol Direct; 2018 Oct; 13(1):22. PubMed ID: 30621760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-read based de novo assembly of low-complexity metagenome samples results in finished genomes and reveals insights into strain diversity and an active phage system.
    Somerville V; Lutz S; Schmid M; Frei D; Moser A; Irmler S; Frey JE; Ahrens CH
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):143. PubMed ID: 31238873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential and pitfalls of eukaryotic metagenome skimming: a test case for lichens.
    Greshake B; Zehr S; Dal Grande F; Meiser A; Schmitt I; Ebersberger I
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Mar; 16(2):511-23. PubMed ID: 26345272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ContigExtender: a new approach to improving de novo sequence assembly for viral metagenomics data.
    Deng Z; Delwart E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):119. PubMed ID: 33706720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating
    Vosloo S; Huo L; Anderson CL; Dai Z; Sevillano M; Pinto A
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0143421. PubMed ID: 34730411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A scalable assembly-free variable selection algorithm for biomarker discovery from metagenomes.
    Gkanogiannis A; Gazut S; Salanoubat M; Kanj S; Brüls T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):311. PubMed ID: 27542753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs.
    Kolmogorov M; Bickhart DM; Behsaz B; Gurevich A; Rayko M; Shin SB; Kuhn K; Yuan J; Polevikov E; Smith TPL; Pevzner PA
    Nat Methods; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 33020656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical evaluation of 11 de novo assemblers in metagenome assembly.
    Forouzan E; Shariati P; Mousavi Maleki MS; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Aug; 151():99-105. PubMed ID: 29953874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualization-assisted binning of metagenome assemblies reveals potential new pathogenic profiles in idiopathic travelers' diarrhea.
    Zhu Q; Dupont CL; Jones MB; Pham KM; Jiang ZD; DuPont HL; Highlander SK
    Microbiome; 2018 Nov; 6(1):201. PubMed ID: 30409177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.