These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34819128)

  • 1. Development of glaucoma predictive model and risk factors assessment based on supervised models.
    Sharifi M; Khatibi T; Emamian MH; Sadat S; Hashemi H; Fotouhi A
    BioData Min; 2021 Nov; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 34819128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of diabetes disease using an ensemble of machine learning multi-classifier models.
    Abnoosian K; Farnoosh R; Behzadi MH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Sep; 24(1):337. PubMed ID: 37697283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Kim SJ; Cho KJ; Oh S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177726. PubMed ID: 28542342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proposing a machine-learning based method to predict stillbirth before and during delivery and ranking the features: nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study.
    Khatibi T; Hanifi E; Sepehri MM; Allahqoli L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):202. PubMed ID: 33706701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensemble of heterogeneous classifiers for diagnosis and prediction of coronary artery disease with reduced feature subset.
    Velusamy D; Ramasamy K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jan; 198():105770. PubMed ID: 33027698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis.
    Imura T; Toda H; Iwamoto Y; Inagawa T; Imada N; Tanaka R; Inoue Y; Araki H; Araki O
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Oct; 30(10):106011. PubMed ID: 34325274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning models based on the dimensionality reduction of standard automated perimetry data for glaucoma diagnosis.
    Lee SD; Lee JH; Choi YG; You HC; Kang JH; Jun CH
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 Mar; 94():110-116. PubMed ID: 30871677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method for predicting kidney stone type using ensemble learning.
    Kazemi Y; Mirroshandel SA
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Jan; 84():117-126. PubMed ID: 29241659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry.
    Silva FR; Vidotti VG; Cremasco F; Dias M; Gomi ES; Costa VP
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 23929078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble Feature Learning of Genomic Data Using Support Vector Machine.
    Anaissi A; Goyal M; Catchpoole DR; Braytee A; Kennedy PJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157330. PubMed ID: 27304923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.
    Paliwal N; Jaiswal P; Tutino VM; Shallwani H; Davies JM; Siddiqui AH; Rai R; Meng H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E7. PubMed ID: 30453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A data-driven approach to predicting diabetes and cardiovascular disease with machine learning.
    Dinh A; Miertschin S; Young A; Mohanty SD
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Nov; 19(1):211. PubMed ID: 31694707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.
    Lee J; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Ha A; Kim YW; Park KH
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 64(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 31848786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma classification based on intra-class and extra-class discriminative correlation and consensus ensemble classifier.
    Kishore B; Ananthamoorthy NP
    Genomics; 2020 Sep; 112(5):3089-3096. PubMed ID: 32470644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved support vector machine classification for imbalanced medical datasets by novel hybrid sampling combining modified mega-trend-diffusion and bagging extreme learning machine model.
    Lin LS; Kao CH; Li YJ; Chen HH; Chen HY
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Sep; 20(10):17672-17701. PubMed ID: 38052532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection.
    Townsend KA; Wollstein G; Danks D; Sung KR; Ishikawa H; Kagemann L; Gabriele ML; Schuman JS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 92(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 18523087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management.
    An G; Omodaka K; Tsuda S; Shiga Y; Takada N; Kikawa T; Nakazawa T; Yokota H; Akiba M
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():6874765. PubMed ID: 30018755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data-driven diagnosis of spinal abnormalities using feature selection and machine learning algorithms.
    Raihan-Al-Masud M; Mondal MRH
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228422. PubMed ID: 32027680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Sensor Data to Detect Lameness and Mastitis Treatment Events in Dairy Cows: A Comparison of Classification Models.
    Post C; Rietz C; Büscher W; Müller U
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 32664417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroke Prediction with Machine Learning Methods among Older Chinese.
    Wu Y; Fang Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32178250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.