These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3482096)

  • 1. An in vitro comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes.
    Lev R; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):523-30. PubMed ID: 3482096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Goodman A; Reader A; Beck M; Melfi R; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1985 Jun; 11(6):249-56. PubMed ID: 3861764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR; Crum LA; Walton AJ
    J Endod; 1988 Oct; 14(10):486-93. PubMed ID: 3255774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals.
    Reynolds MA; Madison S; Walton RE; Krell KV; Rittman BR
    J Endod; 1987 Jul; 13(7):307-14. PubMed ID: 3481796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Endosonic and manual endodontics: comparative analysis of the canal using optical and electron microscopy].
    Franchi M; Lavagnoli G; Ruggeri A
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Apr; 54(6):17-9, 21-9, 31-2 passim. PubMed ID: 3460855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
    Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [SEM evaluation of manual endodontics and a system using ultrasonics in canal preparation].
    Curiale F; Cassaro A; Margiotta V; Buzzanca R
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1985; 5(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 3870055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [SEM study of the surface conditions after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic canal preparation].
    Ciucchi B; Dietschi JM; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1693-7. PubMed ID: 3462142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative SEM study of the shape of the canal after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic preparation].
    Dietschi J; Ciucchi B; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1687-91. PubMed ID: 3462141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Root canal preparation using sonic-activated instruments].
    Petschelt A; Oberschachtsiek H; Raab W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Jan; 42(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 3471462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The synergistic relationship between ultrasound and sodium hypochlorite: a scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Cameron JA
    J Endod; 1987 Nov; 13(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 3482099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cleansing and shaping of curved canals: S.E.M. evaluation of an ultrasonic endodontic instrument].
    Pagavino G; Pace R; Ciabattini G
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 2485788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The smear layer. Current data on this iatrogenic endodontic residue].
    Deverin JM; Delzangles B
    Chir Dent Fr; 1986 May; 56(339):29-36. PubMed ID: 3527589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Manual and ultrasonic instrumentation. Evaluation of efficiency in cleaning root canal walls].
    Goldberg F; Massone EJ
    Rev Esp Endodoncia; 1985 Sep; 3(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 3939260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Initial penetration technic for simultaneous progressive enlargement. 2. Comparative scanning electron microscopy study of root surfaces after classic instrumentation and progressive enlargement].
    Ricci C; Laurichesse JM; Boulekbache H
    Rev Fr Endod; 1988 Jun; 7(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 3267844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of endosonic and hand instrumentation in the debridement of root canal systems.
    Glaser CG; Goerig AC; Zislis T; Pugh RJ; Luciano J
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Jul; 20(7):525-30. PubMed ID: 2626539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The use of ultrasound in endodontics: S.E.M. study and clinical controls].
    Castellucci A; Becciani R; Bertelli E
    Dent Cadmos; 1987 Jan; 55(1):27-9, 31-2, 35-42 passim. PubMed ID: 3477484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three methods of cleaning and shaping the root canal in vitro.
    Goldman M; White RR; Moser CR; Tenca JI
    J Endod; 1988 Jan; 14(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 3162937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.