These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34821866)

  • 1. Impacts of Phantom Off-Center Positioning on CT Numbers and Dose Index CTDIv: An Evaluation of Two CT Scanners from GE.
    Zheng X; Gutsche L; Al-Hayek Y; Stanton J; Elshami W; Jensen K
    J Imaging; 2021 Nov; 7(11):. PubMed ID: 34821866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy.
    Cheung JP; Shugard E; Mistry N; Pouliot J; Chen J
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):892-901. PubMed ID: 30457170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
    McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
    Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impacts of Vertical Off-Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study.
    Al-Hayek Y; Spuur K; Davidson R; Hayre C; Zheng X
    J Imaging; 2022 Jun; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 35877619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impacts of vertical off-centring, tube voltage, and phantom size on computed tomography numbers: An experimental study.
    Al-Hayek Y; Spuur K; Davidson R; Hayre C; Zheng X
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):641-647. PubMed ID: 35569317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 0° vs. 180° CT localiser: The effect of vertical off-centring, phantom positioning and tube voltage on dose optimisation in multidetector computed tomography.
    Al-Hayek Y; Zheng X; Davidson R; Hayre C; Al-Mousa D; Finlay C; Spuur K
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 69(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 34402591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study.
    Marsh RM; Silosky MS
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
    Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Algorithm development for automatic laser alignment assessment on an ACR CT phantom and its evaluation on sixteen CT scanners.
    Anam C; Amilia R; Naufal A; Dougherty G
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Oct; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37788647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in computed tomography for select procedures in Pudhuchery, India.
    Saravanakumar A; Vaideki K; Govindarajan KN; Jayakumar S
    J Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 39(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 24600173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
    Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution.
    Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Miller CM; Nelson RC; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 19770340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical Note: Development and validation of an open data format for CT projection data.
    Chen B; Duan X; Yu Z; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough C
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6964-72. PubMed ID: 26632052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Wu V; Podgorsak MB; Tran TA; Malhotra HK; Wang IZ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4451-63. PubMed ID: 21859046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models.
    Bache ST; Stauduhar PJ; Liu X; Loyer EM; John RX
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 28300384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.