These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34823098)

  • 1. A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Wang J; Fang S; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106500. PubMed ID: 34823098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A proactive crash risk prediction framework for lane-changing behavior incorporating individual driving styles.
    Zhang Y; Chen Y; Gu X; Sze NN; Huang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107072. PubMed ID: 37137214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aggressive driving behavior prediction considering driver's intention based on multivariate-temporal feature data.
    Xu W; Wang J; Fu T; Gong H; Sobhani A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106477. PubMed ID: 34813934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of Driver's Intention of Lane Change by Augmenting Sensor Information Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Kim IH; Bong JH; Park J; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactive Lane Keeping System for Autonomous Vehicles Using LSTM-RNN Considering Driving Environments.
    Jeong Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-Series-Based Personalized Lane-Changing Decision-Making Model.
    Ye M; Pu L; Li P; Lu X; Liu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lane-change intention recognition considering oncoming traffic: Novel insights revealed by advances in deep learning.
    Liu H; Wang T; Li W; Ye X; Yuan Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107476. PubMed ID: 38325183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.
    Das A; Khan MN; Ahmed MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105578. PubMed ID: 32408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Key feature selection and risk prediction for lane-changing behaviors based on vehicles' trajectory data.
    Chen T; Shi X; Wong YD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():156-169. PubMed ID: 31150922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian Driver Agent Model for Autonomous Vehicles System Based on Knowledge-Aware and Real-Time Data.
    Ma J; Xie H; Song K; Liu H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33418987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Support Vector Machine Based Lane-Changing Behavior Recognition and Lateral Trajectory Prediction.
    Feng Y; Yan X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():3632333. PubMed ID: 35592714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrated framework for driving risk evaluation that combines lane-changing detection and an attention-based prediction model.
    Feng Z; Wei X; Bi Y; Zhu D; Huang Z
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024 Oct; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 39356684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatiotemporal Feature Enhancement Aids the Driving Intention Inference of Intelligent Vehicles.
    Chen H; Chen H; Liu H; Feng X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36142087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-Modal Vehicle Trajectory Prediction by Collaborative Learning of Lane Orientation, Vehicle Interaction, and Intention.
    Tian W; Wang S; Wang Z; Wu M; Zhou S; Bi X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A mathematical model for predicting lane changes using the steering wheel angle.
    Schmidt K; Beggiato M; Hoffmann KH; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():85-90. PubMed ID: 24913491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hybrid deep learning approach for driver anomalous lane changing identification.
    Fan P; Guo J; Wang Y; Wijnands JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106661. PubMed ID: 35462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection and Risk Analysis with Lane-Changing Decision Algorithms for Autonomous Vehicles.
    Mechernene A; Judalet V; Chaibet A; Boukhnifer M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial Proprioceptive Reflex Warning Using EMG in Advanced Driving Assistance System.
    Hussain MI; Rafique MA; Kim J; Jeon M; Pedrycz W
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():1635-1644. PubMed ID: 37028308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study on diversion behavior in weaving segments: Individualized traffic conflict prediction and causal mechanism analysis.
    Yuan R; Abdel-Aty M; Xiang Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107681. PubMed ID: 38897142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term prediction of safety and operation impacts of lane changes in oscillations with empirical vehicle trajectories.
    Li M; Li Z; Xu C; Liu T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105345. PubMed ID: 31751785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.