BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34823522)

  • 41. Application of texture analysis based on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images in discriminating Gleason scores of prostate cancer.
    Pan R; Yang X; Shu Z; Gu Y; Weng L; Jia Y; Feng J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1207-1218. PubMed ID: 32925162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.
    Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Mones F; Westphalen AC; Mally D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6042-6051. PubMed ID: 32591887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.
    Epstein JI; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Pierorazio PM
    Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 22336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gleason stratifications prognostic for survival in men receiving definitive external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.
    Rusthoven CG; Waxweiler TV; DeWitt PE; Flaig TW; Raben D; Kavanagh BD
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):71.e11-9. PubMed ID: 25151595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Use of the Prostate Health Index for detection of prostate cancer: results from a large academic practice.
    Tosoian JJ; Druskin SC; Andreas D; Mullane P; Chappidi M; Joo S; Ghabili K; Agostino J; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Schaeffer EM; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 28117387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Favorable Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer Shows Comparable Outcomes With Gleason 3 + 3 Prostate Cancer: Implications for the Expansion of Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance.
    Lee H; Lee IJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Hong SK
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e1117-e1122. PubMed ID: 28843377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Prebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men With Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies.
    Mendhiratta N; Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Wysock JS; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Deng FM; Melamed J; Zhou M; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Urology; 2015 Dec; 86(6):1192-8. PubMed ID: 26335497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up.
    Heering M; Berg KD; Brasso K; Iversen P; Røder MA
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28317581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predictors of Gleason Score (GS) upgrading on subsequent prostatectomy: a single Institution study in a cohort of patients with GS 6.
    Mehta V; Rycyna K; Baesens BM; Barkan GA; Paner GP; Flanigan RC; Wojcik EM; Venkataraman G
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2012; 5(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 22949931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Natural Language Processing for Surveillance of Cervical and Anal Cancer and Precancer: Algorithm Development and Split-Validation Study.
    Oliveira CR; Niccolai P; Ortiz AM; Sheth SS; Shapiro ED; Niccolai LM; Brandt CA
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e20826. PubMed ID: 32469840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness with a combination of radiomics and machine learning-based analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Liu B; Cheng J; Guo DJ; He XJ; Luo YD; Zeng Y; Li CM
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Nov; 74(11):896.e1-896.e8. PubMed ID: 31495546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Predictive efficacy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.
    Sun GX; Shen PF; Zhang XM; Gong J; Gui HJ; Shu KP; Liu JD; Zhao J; Yang YJ; Chen XQ; Chen N; Zeng H
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(5):573-578. PubMed ID: 27569001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pathological Concordance between Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Using Transperineal Sector Mapping Biopsies: Validation and Comparison with Transrectal Biopsies.
    Marra G; Eldred-Evans D; Challacombe B; Van Hemelrijck M; Polson A; Pomplun S; Foster CS; Brown C; Cahill D; Gontero P; Popert R; Muir G
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 28768264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accurate pattern-based extraction of complex Gleason score expressions from pathology reports.
    Miettinen J; Tanskanen T; Degerlund H; Nevala A; Malila N; Pitkäniemi J
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Aug; 120():103850. PubMed ID: 34182148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Rule-Based Information Extraction from Free-Text Pathology Reports Reveals Trends in South African Female Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes and Ki67 Expression.
    Achilonu OJ; Singh E; Nimako G; Eijkemans RMJC; Musenge E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():6157861. PubMed ID: 35355821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Gene-expression analysis of gleason grade 3 tumor glands embedded in low- and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Hoogland AM; Böttcher R; Verhoef E; Jenster G; van Leenders GJ
    Oncotarget; 2016 Jun; 7(25):37846-37856. PubMed ID: 27191985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The use of narrative text for injury surveillance research: a systematic review.
    McKenzie K; Scott DA; Campbell MA; McClure RJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 20159054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.