These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34824382)

  • 1. Rank-invariant estimation of inbreeding coefficients.
    Zhang QS; Goudet J; Weir BS
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jan; 128(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34824382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of marker-based estimators of inbreeding and inbreeding depression.
    Caballero A; Fernández A; Villanueva B; Toro MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Dec; 54(1):82. PubMed ID: 36575379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Unified Characterization of Population Structure and Relatedness.
    Weir BS; Goudet J
    Genetics; 2017 Aug; 206(4):2085-2103. PubMed ID: 28550018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of inbreeding and kinship coefficients via latent identity-by-descent states.
    Guan Y; Levy D
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 40(2):. PubMed ID: 38364309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved estimation of inbreeding and kinship in pigs using optimized SNP panels.
    Lopes MS; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Duijvesteijn N; Lopes PS; Guimarães SE; Knol EF
    BMC Genet; 2013 Sep; 14():92. PubMed ID: 24063757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-identifiability of identity coefficients at biallelic loci.
    Csűrös M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Mar; 92():22-9. PubMed ID: 24269334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.
    Chybicki IJ; Burczyk J
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18936113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of inbreeding measures using a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
    Alemu SW; Kadri NK; Harland C; Faux P; Charlier C; Caballero A; Druet T
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Mar; 126(3):410-423. PubMed ID: 33159183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking kinship estimation tools for ancient genomes using pedigree simulations.
    Aktürk Ş; Mapelli I; Güler MN; Gürün K; Katırcıoğlu B; Vural KB; Sağlıcan E; Çetin M; Yaka R; Sürer E; Atağ G; Çokoğlu SS; Sevkar A; Altınışık NE; Koptekin D; Somel M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 38676702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of family relatedness on characteristics of estimated IBD probabilities in relation to precision of QTL estimates.
    Freyer G; Hernández-Sánchez J; Vukasinovic N
    BMC Genet; 2010 Sep; 11():85. PubMed ID: 20868519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relatedness coefficients in pedigrees with inbred founders.
    Vigeland MD
    J Math Biol; 2020 Jul; 81(1):185-207. PubMed ID: 32514944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputed genotypes: Assessing different estimators in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
    Dadousis C; Ablondi M; Cipolat-Gotet C; van Kaam JT; Marusi M; Cassandro M; Sabbioni A; Summer A
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jul; 105(7):5926-5945. PubMed ID: 35534275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations.
    Knief U; Hemmrich-Stanisak G; Wittig M; Franke A; Griffith SC; Kempenaers B; Forstmeier W
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Apr; 114(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 25585923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
    Kardos M; Luikart G; Allendorf FW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.