These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34824552)

  • 1. Radiographic and Esthetic Evaluation Following Immediate Implant Placement with or without Socket Shield and Delayed Implant Placement Following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Santhanakrishnan M; Subramanian V; Ramesh N; Kamaleeshwari R
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2021; 13():479-494. PubMed ID: 34824552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in Soft and Hard Tissues following Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Santhanakrishnan M; Ramesh N; Kamaleeshwari R; Subramanian V
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():5641185. PubMed ID: 34646885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Atef M; El Barbary A; Dahrous MSE; Zahran AF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):456-465. PubMed ID: 34028974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone - Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study.
    Kumar PR; Vikram J; Kher U; Tunkiwala A; Sawhney H
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2021; 25(6):510-517. PubMed ID: 34898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes and Pink Esthetics After Immediate Implant Placement with Socket Shield and Conventional Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Venkatraman N; Jain V; Nanda A; Koli DK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 36(6):674-680. PubMed ID: 38109387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial.
    Abd-Elrahman A; Shaheen M; Askar N; Atef M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):602-611. PubMed ID: 32757311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up.
    Abdullah AH; Abdel Gaber HK; Adel-Khattab D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):548-558. PubMed ID: 35763398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure Rate, Marginal Bone Loss, and Pink Esthetic with Socket-Shield Technique for Immediate Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Velasco Bohórquez P; Rucco R; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Montiel-Company JM; de la Vega Buró S; Madroño EC; Marín LSH; Hernández Montero S
    Biology (Basel); 2021 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34207379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dynamic monitoring and esthetic evaluation of dimensional changes in the peri-implant soft tissue contour after the immediate implant placement and provisionalization with the modified socket-shield technique in the esthetic zone].
    Tang XF; Wu QQ; Chen X; Wang Y; Fu G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 59(6):551-558. PubMed ID: 38808415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shah M; Abdulkareem M; AlQahtani HA; Alsabeeha NHM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1186-1200. PubMed ID: 34380176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hard and soft tissue alterations using dual-zone concept versus connective tissue graft at maxillary immediate implant placement: A 1-year randomized clinical and volumetric trial.
    Fettouh AIA; Ghallab NA; Mina NA; Abdelmalak MS; Abdelrahman AAG; Shalaby AF; Shemais N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):510-525. PubMed ID: 38372450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Immediate Implant Placement Following Extraction with and Without Socket-Shield Technique in Esthetic Region.
    Tiwari S; Bedi RS; Wadhwani P; Aurora JK; Chauhan H
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2020 Dec; 19(4):552-560. PubMed ID: 33071504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports.
    Shadid RM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):110. PubMed ID: 35382808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 26669546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of clinical effects of a modified socket shield technique and the conventional immediate implant placement].
    Xu YM; Huang H; Wang L; Wu QQ; Fu G; Li J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 37(5):490-495. PubMed ID: 31721495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Grandi G; Tuco L; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 26669545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wide diameter immediate post-extractive implants vs delayed placement of normal-diameter implants in preserved sockets in the molar region: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.
    Checchi V; Felice P; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Pistilli R; Grandi G; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):263-278. PubMed ID: 28944355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Esthetic evaluation of conventional and socket shield technique immediate implant restoration].
    Chen L; Li DL; Yang Y; Liu XQ; Tan JG
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):346-351. PubMed ID: 35368160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Socket-shield Technique vs Conventional Immediate Implant Placement for Esthetic Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Salem AS; Mowafey B; El-Negoly SA; Grawish ME
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 35748456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Socket-shield Technique: A Systematic (Scoping) Review of Case Series and Case Reports.
    Al-Sanabani FA; Abidi NH; Al-Ahmari MM; Alhashim NS; Daghriri AA; Al-Makramani BA; Al-Moaleem MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1314-1326. PubMed ID: 35343460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.