158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34824700)
1. 3-D Evaluation of temporary skeletal anchorage sites in the maxilla.
Zago H; Navarro RL; Laranjeira V; Fernandes TM; Conti AC; Oltramari PV
J Clin Exp Dent; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e1131-e1139. PubMed ID: 34824700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of miniscrew angulation in the posterior maxilla using cone-beam computed tomographic image.
Villela HM; Vedovello Filho M; Valdrighi HC; Santamaria-Jr M; Menezes CC; Vedovello SAS
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 23(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 29791691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study.
Sreenivasagan S; Sivakumar A
Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):471-479. PubMed ID: 34172417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A finite element analysis of the maxillary first molar PDL with maxillary protraction in a mixed dentition Class III malocclusion.
Tanaka OM; Araújo EA; Oliver DR; Behrents RG
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Nov; 18(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 26333535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type.
Yoon JH; Cha JY; Choi YJ; Park WS; Han SS; Lee KJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239759. PubMed ID: 32970759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction.
Metzner R; Schwestka-Polly R; Helms HJ; Wiechmann D
Head Face Med; 2015 Jun; 11():22. PubMed ID: 26092262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The nasopalatine canal, a limiting factor for temporary anchorage devices: a cone beam computed tomography data study.
Tilen R; Patcas R; Bornstein MM; Ludwig B; Schätzle M
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov; 39(6):646-653. PubMed ID: 28379399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.
Al Amri MS; Sabban HM; Alsaggaf DH; Alsulaimani FF; Al-Turki GA; Al-Zahrani MS; Zawawi KH
Ann Saudi Med; 2020; 40(4):330-337. PubMed ID: 32757983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interradicular distance and alveolar bone thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of Persian adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.
Golshah A; Salahshour M; Nikkerdar N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):534. PubMed ID: 34657622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tomographic assessment of infrazygomatic crest bone depth for extra-alveolar miniscrew insertion in subjects with different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
Tavares A; Montanha-Andrade K; Cury PR; Crusoé-Rebello I; Neves FS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 33908170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Mesiodistal Angulations of Canine and Molar Teeth in Different Types of Orthodontic Malocclusions: A Retrospective Study.
Cicek O; Yilmaz H; Demir Cicek B
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Teeth angulations after class II treatment with the Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective panoramic analysis.
Bellini-Pereira SA; Sant'Anna GQ; Wagner MC; Aliaga-DelCastillo A; Patel MP; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 32753335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A cone-beam computed tomography study on crown-root morphology of maxillary anterior teeth in Class II, division 2 malocclusion].
Li M; Wang SW; Zhao YJ; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 26885918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography.
Gu Y; Sun C; Wu D; Zhu Q; Leng D; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Oct; 18(1):164. PubMed ID: 30285721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Analysis of the Proximity of Maxillary Posterior Teeth to the Maxillary Sinus Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Tian XM; Qian L; Xin XZ; Wei B; Gong Y
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 26711862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The current overview of the devices of temporary anchorage placed on the palatal bone: CBCT study.
Kotan S; Koç A; Öner Talmaç AG
Odontology; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38564121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual inclination of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Hu X; Huang X; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):503-515. PubMed ID: 32241357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
