These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34824813)

  • 1. Comparing whole-genome shotgun sequencing and DNA metabarcoding approaches for species identification and quantification of pollen species mixtures.
    Bell KL; Petit RA; Cutler A; Dobbs EK; Macpherson JM; Read TD; Burgess KS; Brosi BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(22):16082-16098. PubMed ID: 34824813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures.
    Bell KL; Burgess KS; Botsch JC; Dobbs EK; Read TD; Brosi BJ
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):431-455. PubMed ID: 30118180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-skimming provides accurate quantification for pollen mixtures.
    Lang D; Tang M; Hu J; Zhou X
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1433-1446. PubMed ID: 31325909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How reliable is metabarcoding for pollen identification? An evaluation of different taxonomic assignment strategies by cross-validation.
    San Martin G; Hautier L; Mingeot D; Dubois B
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16567. PubMed ID: 38313030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant-pollinator interactions.
    Bell KL; Fowler J; Burgess KS; Dobbs EK; Gruenewald D; Lawley B; Morozumi C; Brosi BJ
    Appl Plant Sci; 2017 Jun; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 28690929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection.
    Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282715. PubMed ID: 37071613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MinION Sequencing of Yeast Mock Communities To Assess the Effect of Databases and ITS-LSU Markers on the Reliability of Metabarcoding Analysis.
    Conti A; Casagrande Pierantoni D; Robert V; Corte L; Cardinali G
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Feb; 11(1):e0105222. PubMed ID: 36519933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An
    Bell KL; Loeffler VM; Brosi BJ
    Appl Plant Sci; 2017 Mar; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 28337390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shotgun metagenomics of soil invertebrate communities reflects taxonomy, biomass, and reference genome properties.
    Schmidt A; Schneider C; Decker P; Hohberg K; Römbke J; Lehmitz R; Bálint M
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Jul; 12(6):e8991. PubMed ID: 35784064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plant-pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection.
    Gous A; Swanevelder DZH; Eardley CD; Willows-Munro S
    Evol Appl; 2019 Feb; 12(2):187-197. PubMed ID: 30697333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the effectiveness of metagenomics and metabarcoding for diet analysis of a leaf-feeding monkey (Pygathrix nemaeus).
    Srivathsan A; Sha JC; Vogler AP; Meier R
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Mar; 15(2):250-61. PubMed ID: 25042073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental quantification of pollen with DNA metabarcoding using ITS1 and trnL.
    Baksay S; Pornon A; Burrus M; Mariette J; Andalo C; Escaravage N
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4202. PubMed ID: 32144370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taxonomic Characterization of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Based on Non-Overlapping Paired-End Sequencing of Nuclear Ribosomal Loci.
    Cornman RS; Otto CR; Iwanowicz D; Pettis JS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145365. PubMed ID: 26700168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets.
    Portik DM; Brown CT; Pierce-Ward NT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):541. PubMed ID: 36513983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing the effect of pollen exine rupture on metabarcoding with Illumina sequencing.
    Swenson SJ; Gemeinholzer B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245611. PubMed ID: 33529182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of amplicon and shotgun sequencing for accurate biomass estimation in invertebrate community samples.
    Bista I; Carvalho GR; Tang M; Walsh K; Zhou X; Hajibabaei M; Shokralla S; Seymour M; Bradley D; Liu S; Christmas M; Creer S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29667329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Species Identification in Traditional Herbal Patent Medicine, Wuhu San, Based on Shotgun Metabarcoding.
    Liu J; Mu W; Shi M; Zhao Q; Kong W; Xie H; Shi L
    Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():607200. PubMed ID: 33664667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data.
    Brumfield KD; Huq A; Colwell RR; Olds JL; Leddy MB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228899. PubMed ID: 32053657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating belowground plant abundance with DNA metabarcoding.
    Matesanz S; Pescador DS; Pías B; Sánchez AM; Chacón-Labella J; Illuminati A; de la Cruz M; López-Angulo J; Marí-Mena N; Vizcaíno A; Escudero A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1265-1277. PubMed ID: 31232514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.