286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34825003)
1. Outcome Assessment According to the Thickness and Direction of the Acellular Dermal Matrix after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Hur J; Han HH
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8101009. PubMed ID: 34825003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Dermal Matrix Brand in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
Johnson AC; Colakoglu S; Siddikoglu D; Li A; Kaoutzanis C; Cohen JB; Chong TW; Mathes DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 35499525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Powers JM; Reuter Muñoz KD; Parkerson J; Nigro LC; Blanchet NP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Dec; 148(6):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 34644266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.
Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Complications in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Human Tissues.
Broyles JM; Liao EC; Kim J; Heistein J; Sisco M; Karp N; Lau FH; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 33877063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Comparison of Strattice and SurgiMend in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mazari FAK; Wattoo GM; Kazzazi NH; Kolar KM; Olubowale OO; Rogers CE; Azmy IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):283-293. PubMed ID: 29369979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
Heine N; Hoesl V; Seitz S; Prantl L; Brebant V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Difference in the outcomes of anterior tenting and wrapping techniques for acellular dermal matrix coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Sohn SM; Lee HC; Park SH; Yoon ES
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Oct; 85():266-275. PubMed ID: 37536194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Maisel Lotan A; Ben Yehuda D; Allweis TM; Scheflan M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 31441807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
Chandarana M; Harries S;
BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Analysis of Sterile Freeze-Dried Versus Sterile Pre-Hydration Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Park KC; Park ES; Cha HG; Kim SY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(5):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 33959782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Han WY; Han SJ; Kim EK; Han HH; Eom JS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():461-466. PubMed ID: 37944457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
