These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34825443)
1. Evaluation of the marginal excess cement and retention force of implant-supported zirconia crowns with various vent designs under different cement application patterns. Wang F; Li S; Li Q; Dong H J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Apr; 34(3):565-573. PubMed ID: 34825443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The distribution of marginal excess cement of implant-supported vented and non-vented zirconia crowns with and without cleaning procedures. Wang F; Li Q; Chen L; Liu H; Chen L; Dong H J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 36951153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method. Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of crown venting or pre-cementing of CAD/CAM-constructed all-ceramic crowns luted on YTZ implants on marginal cement excess. Zaugg LK; Zehnder I; Rohr N; Fischer J; Zitzmann NU Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29044723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should the vent hole of posterior implant crowns be placed on the lateral surface? An in vitro study of the hydrodynamic feature of cement extrusion and retention ability. Ye S; Zhou H; Lyu X; Feng H; Liu M; Wen C PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276198. PubMed ID: 36264869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant. Rohr N; Brunner S; Märtin S; Fischer J J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term retention of zirconia crowns cemented with current automixed cements. Lepe X; Streiff KR; Johnson GH J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):788-794. PubMed ID: 32669207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Vent Hole and Cement Type on Fracture Resistance of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Talay Çevlik E; Alkan Demetoğlu G; Yıldız P J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):411-416. PubMed ID: 35752941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns. Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of the effect of a vent hole on excess cement expressed at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant crowns. Patel D; Invest JC; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 19166549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study. Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations. Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection of 1-mm venting or 2.5-mm screw access holes on implant crowns based on cement extrusion and retention capacity. Zhou H; Ye S; Liu M; Feng H; Wen C BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):108. PubMed ID: 35366875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant-supported restorations?: An in vitro study. Gönder A; Polat S; Kılıçarslan MA; Ocak M; Tamam E Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):807-814. PubMed ID: 37232125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns. Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention. Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of different cementation techniques on retained excess cement and uniaxial retention of the implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study. Begum Z; Sonika R; Pratik C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1333-7. PubMed ID: 25153002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cement type on vertical marginal discrepancy and residual excess cement in screwmentable and cementable implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns. Yıldız P; Alkan Demetoğlu G; Talay Çevlik E Odontology; 2024 Oct; 112(4):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 38634968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cement application techniques on the adaptation and retention of provisional crowns. Alabdulkader MA; Habib SR Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(6):945-955. PubMed ID: 30124460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]