These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34826371)

  • 21. Prediction-based variable selection for component-wise gradient boosting.
    Potts S; Bergherr E; Reinke C; Griesbach C
    Int J Biostat; 2024 May; 20(1):293-314. PubMed ID: 38000054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Boosting multi-state models.
    Reulen H; Kneib T
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Apr; 22(2):241-62. PubMed ID: 25990764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robust statistical boosting with quantile-based adaptive loss functions.
    Speller J; Staerk C; Mayr A
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):111-129. PubMed ID: 35950232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Boosting joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data.
    Waldmann E; Taylor-Robinson D; Klein N; Kneib T; Pressler T; Schmid M; Mayr A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1104-1121. PubMed ID: 28321912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Standard errors for EM estimates in generalized linear models with random effects.
    Friedl H; Kauermann G
    Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 10985213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Significance Tests for Boosted Location and Scale Models with Linear Base-Learners.
    Hepp T; Schmid M; Mayr A
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30990787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proportional likelihood ratio mixed model for discrete longitudinal data.
    Wu H; Jones MP
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2272-2285. PubMed ID: 33588517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Boosting for high-dimensional two-class prediction.
    Blagus R; Lusa L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():300. PubMed ID: 26390865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variable selection for semiparametric mixed models in longitudinal studies.
    Ni X; Zhang D; Zhang HH
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 19397585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.
    Vonesh EF; Chinchilli VM; Pu K
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):572-87. PubMed ID: 10766504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Classification of longitudinal data through a semiparametric mixed-effects model based on lasso-type estimators.
    Arribas-Gil A; De la Cruz R; Lebarbier E; Meza C
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):333-43. PubMed ID: 25639332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nonparametric modeling of neural point processes via stochastic gradient boosting regression.
    Truccolo W; Donoghue JP
    Neural Comput; 2007 Mar; 19(3):672-705. PubMed ID: 17298229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A boosting method to select the random effects in linear mixed models.
    Battauz M; Vidoni P
    Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38465986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incorporating pathway information into boosting estimation of high-dimensional risk prediction models.
    Binder H; Schumacher M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():18. PubMed ID: 19144132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Permutation-based variance component test in generalized linear mixed model with application to multilocus genetic association study.
    Zeng P; Zhao Y; Li H; Wang T; Chen F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():37. PubMed ID: 25897803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation Methods for Mixed Logistic Models with Few Clusters.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):790-804. PubMed ID: 27802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The gradient boosting algorithm and random boosting for genome-assisted evaluation in large data sets.
    González-Recio O; Jiménez-Montero JA; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):614-24. PubMed ID: 23102953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modelling spatial disease rates using maximum likelihood.
    Leroux BG
    Stat Med; 2000 Sep 15-30; 19(17-18):2321-32. PubMed ID: 10960856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximum likelihood estimation based on Newton-Raphson iteration for the bivariate random effects model in test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Willis BH; Baragilly M; Coomar D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1197-1211. PubMed ID: 31184270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.