306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34828372)
1. DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.
van Oorschot RAH; Meakin GE; Kokshoorn B; Goray M; Szkuta B
Genes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA transfer in forensic science: A review.
van Oorschot RAH; Szkuta B; Meakin GE; Kokshoorn B; Goray M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():140-166. PubMed ID: 30399535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sharing data on DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery: Arguments for harmonization and standardization.
Kokshoorn B; Aarts LHJ; Ansell R; Connolly E; Drotz W; Kloosterman AD; McKenna LG; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():260-269. PubMed ID: 30273824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An inter-laboratory comparison study on transfer, persistence and recovery of DNA from cable ties.
Steensma K; Ansell R; Clarisse L; Connolly E; Kloosterman AD; McKenna LG; van Oorschot RAH; Szkuta B; Kokshoorn B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():95-104. PubMed ID: 28858675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reporting on forensic biology findings given activity level issues in the Netherlands.
Kokshoorn B; Luijsterburg M
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Feb; 343():111545. PubMed ID: 36634430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stabbing simulations and DNA transfer.
Samie L; Hicks T; Castella V; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():73-80. PubMed ID: 26875110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of human cell material: DNA and RNA profiling of public and private objects and after activity scenarios.
van den Berge M; Ozcanhan G; Zijlstra S; Lindenbergh A; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():81-9. PubMed ID: 26736139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
Baechler S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [DNA-based personal identification in disaster].
Wei W; Yun LB; Hou YP
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 25(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 20000052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. American forensic DNA practitioners' opinion on activity level evaluative reporting.
Yang YJ; Prinz M; McKiernan H; Oldoni F
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1357-1369. PubMed ID: 35568965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA detection of a temporary and original user of an office space.
Goray M; Kokshoorn B; Steensma K; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102203. PubMed ID: 31751912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On DNA transfer: The lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better.
Gosch A; Courts C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():24-36. PubMed ID: 30731249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery of DNA traces from clothing: An inter-laboratory study on worn upper garments.
Szkuta B; Ansell R; Boiso L; Connolly E; Kloosterman AD; Kokshoorn B; McKenna LG; Steensma K; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():56-68. PubMed ID: 31229887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
