These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34828894)
1. Development of a DNA Metabarcoding Method for the Identification of Bivalve Species in Seafood Products. Gense K; Peterseil V; Licina A; Wagner M; Cichna-Markl M; Dobrovolny S; Hochegger R Foods; 2021 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 34828894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Species identification of bivalve molluscs by pyrosequencing. Abbadi M; Marciano S; Tosi F; De Battisti C; Panzarin V; Arcangeli G; Cattoli G J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Jan; 97(2):512-519. PubMed ID: 27068666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a DNA metabarcoding method for the identification of fifteen mammalian and six poultry species in food. Dobrovolny S; Blaschitz M; Weinmaier T; Pechatschek J; Cichna-Markl M; Indra A; Hufnagl P; Hochegger R Food Chem; 2019 Jan; 272():354-361. PubMed ID: 30309555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of Mammalian and Poultry Species in Food and Pet Food Samples Using 16S rDNA Metabarcoding. Preckel L; Brünen-Nieweler C; Denay G; Petersen H; Cichna-Markl M; Dobrovolny S; Hochegger R Foods; 2021 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 34829156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interlaboratory Validation of a DNA Metabarcoding Assay for Mammalian and Poultry Species to Detect Food Adulteration. Dobrovolny S; Uhlig S; Frost K; Schlierf A; Nichani K; Simon K; Cichna-Markl M; Hochegger R Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 35454695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a DNA Metabarcoding Method for the Identification of Insects in Food. Hillinger S; Saeckler J; Domig KJ; Dobrovolny S; Hochegger R Foods; 2023 Mar; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36900603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for species identification in salmon products. Wang N; Xing RR; Zhou MY; Sun RX; Han JX; Zhang JK; Zheng WJ; Chen Y Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2021 May; 38(5):754-768. PubMed ID: 33783328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shellfish and residual chemical contaminants: hazards, monitoring, and health risk assessment along French coasts. Guéguen M; Amiard JC; Arnich N; Badot PM; Claisse D; Guérin T; Vernoux JP Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 213():55-111. PubMed ID: 21541848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seafood Identification in Multispecies Products: Assessment of 16SrRNA, cytb, and COI Universal Primers' Efficiency as a Preliminary Analytical Step for Setting up Metabarcoding Next-Generation Sequencing Techniques. Giusti A; Tinacci L; Sotelo CG; Marchetti M; Guidi A; Zheng W; Armani A J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Apr; 65(13):2902-2912. PubMed ID: 28290697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of Mytilus spp. and Pecten maximus in Irish waters by standard PCR of the 18S rDNA gene and multiplex PCR of the 16S rDNA gene. Bendezu IF; Slater JW; Carney BF Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2005; 7(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 16206017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gut Microbiomes of the Eastern Oyster ( Pierce ML; Ward JE mSphere; 2019 Dec; 4(6):. PubMed ID: 31826972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the metabarcoding ripe enough to be applied to the authentication of foodstuff of animal origin? A systematic review. Giusti A; Malloggi C; Magagna G; Filipello V; Armani A Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2024 Jan; 23(1):e13256. PubMed ID: 38284609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking and Validation of a Bioinformatics Workflow for Meat Species Identification Using 16S rDNA Metabarcoding. Denay G; Preckel L; Petersen H; Pietsch K; Wöhlke A; Brünen-Nieweler C Foods; 2023 Feb; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36900485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA metabarcoding for identification of species used in fish burgers. Mottola A; Piredda R; Catanese G; Giorelli F; Cagnazzo G; Ciccarese G; Dambrosio A; Quaglia NC; Di Pinto A Ital J Food Saf; 2022 Aug; 11(3):10412. PubMed ID: 36120526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do feeding responses of a non-native bivalve outperform the native one in a coastal lagoon? A possible explanation for the invasion success of the dark false mussel Rodrigues N; Ribeiro D; C Miyahira I; G M Portugal S; N Santos L; A F Neves R PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15848. PubMed ID: 37609442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The international standard ISO/TS 21872-1 to study the occurence of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio cholerae in seafood: ITS improvement by use of a chromogenic medium and PCR. Rosec JP; Causse V; Cruz B; Rauzier J; Carnat L Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 157(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22682545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Authentication of Hedyotis products by adaptor ligation-mediated PCR and metabarcoding. Yik MH; Lo YT; Lin X; Sun W; Chan TF; Shaw PC J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2021 Mar; 196():113920. PubMed ID: 33549873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study on metal contamination in Estero de Urias lagoon, Gulf of California, using oysters, mussels and artificial mussels: Implications on pollution monitoring and public health risk. Ruiz-Fernández AC; Wu RSS; Lau TC; Pérez-Bernal LH; Sánchez-Cabeza JA; Chiu JMY Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt A):197-205. PubMed ID: 30172989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]