142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34830711)
1. Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition.
Ghamri M; Kanavakis G; Gkantidis N
J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel Anterior Cranial Base Area for Voxel-Based Superimposition of Craniofacial CBCTs.
Kanavakis G; Ghamri M; Gkantidis N
J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 35743607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes.
Häner ST; Kanavakis G; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 31529585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial cone-beam computed tomographies for facial soft tissue assessment: Reproducibility and segmentation effects.
Kanavakis G; Häner ST; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):343-351.e1. PubMed ID: 33641815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches.
Nada RM; Maal TJ; Breuning KH; Bergé SJ; Mostafa YA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16520. PubMed ID: 21347419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of methods used for 3-dimensional superimposition of craniofacial skeletal structures: a systematic review.
Mai DD; Stucki S; Gkantidis N
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9263. PubMed ID: 32547877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients.
Han G; Li J; Wang S; Wang L; Zhou Y; Liu Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):300060520982708. PubMed ID: 33459090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.
Eliliwi M; Bazina M; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 31549857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two 3-dimensional user-friendly voxel-based maxillary and 2-dimensional superimposition methods.
Sheeran S; Hartsfield J; Omami G; Bazina M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jan; 163(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 36549828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear measurements of sinus floor elevation based on voxel-based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography images.
Huang J; Hu J; Luo R; Xie S; Wang Z; Ye Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 31392828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study.
Heinz J; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 30342757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.
Gkantidis N; Schauseil M; Pazera P; Zorkun B; Katsaros C; Ludwig B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118810. PubMed ID: 25706151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional mandibular superimposition techniques against Björk's structural superimposition method.
Franco CS; Sexton C; Flores-Mir C; Healey D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):e253-e273. PubMed ID: 33541785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voxel-based superimposition of Cone Beam CT scans for orthodontic and craniofacial follow-up: Overview and clinical implementation.
Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Salmon B
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):739-748. PubMed ID: 33011138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
