160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34832321)
1. Novel Design and Finite Element Analysis of Diamond-like Porous Implants with Low Stiffness.
Zhang J; Zhang X; Chen Y; Feng W; Chen X
Materials (Basel); 2021 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 34832321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Analysis of Axial Gradient Porous Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Zhang C; Wang Y
J Funct Biomater; 2023 Nov; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38132811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution on Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis with Four Different Commercially Available Implant Systems.
Tyagi R; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Malethia A; Saini N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):835-840. PubMed ID: 33568601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution pattern in all-on-four maxillary restorations supported by porous tantalum and solid titanium implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Masoomi F; Mahboub F
Eur J Transl Myol; 2024 Feb; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 38363221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Porous Microstructures on the Biomechanical Characteristics of a Root Analogue Implant: An Animal Study and a Finite Element Analysis.
Liu T; Chen Y; Apicella A; Mu Z; Yu T; Huang Y; Wang C
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2020 Nov; 6(11):6356-6367. PubMed ID: 33449664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Partial Bone Formation in Additive Manufactured Porous Implants Reduces Predicted Stress and Danger of Fatigue Failure.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Mumith A; Blunn GW
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 48(1):502-514. PubMed ID: 31549330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three dimensional finite element analysis of a novel osteointegrated dental implant designed to reduce stress peak of cortical bone.
Zheng L; Yang J; Hu X; Luo J
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2014; 16(3):21-8. PubMed ID: 25307871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
