160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34832321)
21. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Design of patient specific bone stiffness mimicking scaffold.
Rana M; Chaudhuri A; Biswas JK; Karim SI; Datta P; Karmakar SK; Roychowdhury A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 34227419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Oliveira H; Brizuela Velasco A; Ríos-Santos JV; Sánchez Lasheras F; Lemos BF; Gil FJ; Carvalho A; Herrero-Climent M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(13):. PubMed ID: 32630294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Novel and simplified optimisation pathway using response surface and design of experiments methodologies for dental implants based on the stress of the cortical bone.
Freitas JP; Agostinho Hernandez B; Gonçalves PJP; Baptista EC; Capello Sousa EA
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Nov; 235(11):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 34382455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Orbital stress analysis, Part IV: Use of a "stiffness-graded" biodegradable implants to repair orbital blow-out fracture.
Al-Sukhun J; Penttilä H; Ashammakhi N
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 22337388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical analysis of the osseointegration of porous tantalum implants.
Fraser D; Funkenbusch P; Ercoli C; Meirelles L
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):811-820. PubMed ID: 31703918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of surface treatment on stress distribution in immediately loaded dental implants--a 3D finite element analysis.
Bahrami B; Shahrbaf S; Mirzakouchaki B; Ghalichi F; Ashtiani M; Martin N
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):e89-97. PubMed ID: 24559526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Porous structure design and mechanical behavior analysis based on TPMS for customized root analogue implant.
Song K; Wang Z; Lan J; Ma S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104222. PubMed ID: 33310682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Studies on the Performance of Molar Porous Root-Analogue Implant by Finite Element Model Simulation and Verification of a Case Report.
Guo F; Hu M; Wang C; Huang S; Lou M; Liu C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 78(11):1965.e1-1965.e9. PubMed ID: 32628934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis.
Eraslan O; Inan O
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Aug; 14(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 19543925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of finite element results with photoelastic stress analysis around dental implants with different threads.
Geramizadeh M; Katoozian H; Amid R; Kadkhodazadeh M
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 30152630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of geometric parameters on finite element analysis of bone loading caused by nonpassively fitting implant-supported dental restorations.
Winter W; Steinmann P; Holst S; Karl M
Quintessence Int; 2011 Jun; 42(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 21519584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of a micro-thread at cervical position and a cylindrical intermediate zone on the mechanical behaviour of dental implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Garitaonaindia U; Alcaraz JL
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Sep; 229(9):670-80. PubMed ID: 26334036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A model for the implant-bone interface characteristics of porous dental implants.
Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
J Dent Res; 1982 Aug; 61(8):1006-9. PubMed ID: 6955334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
