BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34833565)

  • 1. The Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Instrumental Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
    Sirintawat N; Leelaratrungruang T; Poovarodom P; Kiattavorncharoen S; Amornsettachai P
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vitro Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Digital Instruments.
    Vohra M; Shenoy A
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52363. PubMed ID: 38361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: Visual, digital camera, and smartphone.
    Jorquera GJ; Atria PJ; Galán M; Feureisen J; Imbarak M; Kernitsky J; Cacciuttolo F; Hirata R; Sampaio CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):784-792. PubMed ID: 33741142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the colour accuracy of a single-lens reflex camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical context.
    Yung D; Tse AK; Hsung RT; Botelho MG; Pow EH; Lam WY
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104681. PubMed ID: 37648197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications.
    Mohammadi A; Bakhtiari Z; Mighani F; Bakhtiari F
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(3):281-286. PubMed ID: 34380816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cross-polarization filters on the trueness of colors obtained with a single-lens reflex camera, macro lens, and a ring flash.
    Yilmaz B; Dede DÖ; Diker E; Fonseca M; Johnston WM; Küçükekenci AS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Sep; 35(6):878-885. PubMed ID: 37073977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Three Shade-matching Devices in Replicating the Shade of Metal Ceramic Restorations: An in vitro Study.
    Lakhanpal S; Neelima MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 27965487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agreement between digital image analysis and clinical spectrophotometer in CIEL*C*h° coordinate differences and total color difference (ΔE) measurements of dental ceramic shade tabs.
    Farah RI
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 27092349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of a standardized gray reference card in dental photography to correct the effects of five commonly used diffusers on the color of 40 extracted human teeth.
    Hein S; Zangl M
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(2):246-59. PubMed ID: 27092350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different digital shade selection methodologies in terms of accuracy.
    Şahin N; Ural Ç
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 16(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 38455674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card.
    Sampaio CS; Atria PJ; Hirata R; Jorquera G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 30093117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparative Study to Check the Accuracy of Tooth Shade Selection With Standardized Digital Photographs and a Spectrophotometer.
    Hina M; Ali MS; Pande D; Pandey KK; Kandwal N; Tasar D; Jadhav MS; Xavier S; S G
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56073. PubMed ID: 38618418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review.
    Tabatabaian F; Beyabanaki E; Alirezaei P; Epakchi S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1084-1104. PubMed ID: 34498789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching.
    Mahn E; Tortora SC; Olate B; Cacciuttolo F; Kernitsky J; Jorquera G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):511-516. PubMed ID: 32197819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of smartphone dental photography in aesthetic analysis.
    Lazar R; Culic B; Gasparik C; Lazar C; Dudea D
    Br Dent J; 2021 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 34815481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of color accuracy and picture quality of digital SLR, point and shoot and mobile cameras used for dental intraoral photography - A pilot study.
    Saincher R; Kumar S; Gopalkrishna P; Maithri M; Sherigar P
    Heliyon; 2022 Apr; 8(4):e09262. PubMed ID: 35464702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods.
    Mehl A; Bosch G; Fischer C; Ender A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):343-361. PubMed ID: 29292410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Dental Photography: Professional vs. Smartphone's Camera.
    Moussa C; Hardan L; Kassis C; Bourgi R; Devoto W; Jorquera G; Panda S; Abou Fadel R; Cuevas-Suárez CE; Lukomska-Szymanska M
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3910291. PubMed ID: 34957302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and accuracy of Crystaleye spectrophotometric system.
    Chen L; Tan JG; Zhou JF; Yang X; Du Y; Wang FP
    Chin J Dent Res; 2010; 13(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21264365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CIE L*a*b*: comparison of digital images obtained photographically by manual and automatic modes.
    Takatsui F; Andrade MF; Neisser MP; Barros LA; Loffredo Lde C
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 23019087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.