These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34836632)
1. Application of a shear-wave elastography prediction model to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions and the adjustment of ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classifications. Yu Y; Ye X; Yang J; Chen L; Zhang M; He Y; Chen Z Clin Radiol; 2022 Feb; 77(2):e147-e153. PubMed ID: 34836632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography. Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions. Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance. Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance. Li DD; Xu HX; Guo LH; Bo XW; Li XL; Wu R; Xu JM; Zhang YF; Zhang K Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3290-300. PubMed ID: 26714967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Han KH; Kim JA Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2695-704. PubMed ID: 23652850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of strain elastography and shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Shahzad R; Fatima I; Anjum T; Shahid A Ann Saudi Med; 2022; 42(5):319-326. PubMed ID: 36252146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions. Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses. Lee EJ; Chang YW Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 32691540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Evaluation of Ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Category 4 Lesions. Li XL; Xu HX; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Huang X; Li DD; Guo LH; Xu JM; Sun LP; Fang L; Xu XH Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2050-7. PubMed ID: 27174418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance. Shang J; Ruan LT; Wang YY; Zhang XJ; Dang Y; Liu B; Wang WL; Song Y; Chang SJ Clin Radiol; 2019 Apr; 74(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 30755314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions. Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters. Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses? Lee EJ; Jung HK; Ko KH; Lee JT; Yoon JH Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1803-11. PubMed ID: 23423637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study. Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required? Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments. Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses. Niu Q; Zhao L; Wang R; Du L; Shi Q; Jia C; Li G; Jin L; Li F Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111391. PubMed ID: 38422608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of shear wave elastography during second-look breast ultrasonography for suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Gil BM; Jung NY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Lee J; Chung MH J Med Ultrason (2001); 2022 Oct; 49(4):719-730. PubMed ID: 36114321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]