223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34836696)
1. Effects of application method on shrinkage vectors and volumetric shrinkage of bulk-fill composites in class-II restorations.
Kaisarly D; Langenegger R; Litzenburger F; Heck K; El Gezawi M; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
Dent Mater; 2022 Jan; 38(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 34836696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of flowable liners on the shrinkage vectors of bulk-fill composites.
Kaisarly D; Meierhofer D; El Gezawi M; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4927-4940. PubMed ID: 33506426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage and its comparison to internal adaptation in bulk fill and conventional composites: A μCT and OCT in vitro analysis.
Sampaio CS; Fernández Arias J; Atria PJ; Cáceres E; Pardo Díaz C; Freitas AZ; Hirata R
Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 31500903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shrinkage vectors in flowable bulk-fill and conventional composites: bulk versus incremental application.
Kaisarly D; El Gezawi M; Keßler A; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1127-1139. PubMed ID: 32653992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities.
Algamaiah H; Sampaio CS; Rigo LC; Janal MN; Giannini M; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Reis AF; Hirata R
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 27925387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography.
Ersen KA; Gürbüz Ö; Özcan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1687-1693. PubMed ID: 31346784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without an intermediate layer: Effect of polymerization shrinkage parameters of the layer material.
Han SH; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Park SH
J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():41-48. PubMed ID: 30391684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage of Class I Flowable Resin Composite Restorations.
Sampaio CS; Chiu KJ; Farrokhmanesh E; Janal M; Puppin-Rontani RM; Giannini M; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Hirata R
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):E16-E23. PubMed ID: 27689769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin.
Jang JH; Park SH; Hwang IN
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 25136904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Internal Adaptation in Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations Using Micro-CT.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 27892836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Oglakci B; Kazak M; Donmez N; Dalkilic EE; Koymen SS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190042. PubMed ID: 31778443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites.
Rizzante FAP; Mondelli RFL; Furuse AY; Borges AFS; Mendonça G; Ishikiriama SK
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan; 27():e20180132. PubMed ID: 30624465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of occlusal cavity configuration on 3D shrinkage vectors in a flowable composite.
Kaisarly D; El Gezawi M; Lai G; Jin J; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jun; 22(5):2047-2056. PubMed ID: 29248963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time in-depth imaging of gap formation in bulk-fill resin composites.
Hayashi J; Espigares J; Takagaki T; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Numata T; Chan D; Sadr A
Dent Mater; 2019 Apr; 35(4):585-596. PubMed ID: 30819550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there correlation between polymerization shrinkage, gap formation, and void in bulk fill composites? A μCT study.
Almeida LJDS; Penha KJS; Souza AF; Lula ECO; Magalhães FC; Lima DM; Firoozmand LM
Braz Oral Res; 2017 Dec; 31():e100. PubMed ID: 29267661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short curing time bulk fill composite systems: volumetric shrinkage, degree of conversion and Vickers hardness.
Sampaio CS; Abreu JLB; Kornfeld B; Silva EMD; Giannini M; Hirata R
Braz Oral Res; 2024; 38():e030. PubMed ID: 38597548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
Rullman I; Patyna M; Janssen B; Willershausen B
Am J Dent; 2017 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the Compliance and Layering Method on the Wall Deflection of Simulated Cavities in Bulk-fill Composite Restoration.
Kim YJ; Kim R; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):e183-e194. PubMed ID: 27820696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
