These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34836808)

  • 1. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat.
    Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100402. PubMed ID: 34836808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part II. Processed pork products.
    Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100383. PubMed ID: 34750079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review: Quality of animal-source foods.
    Prache S; Adamiec C; Astruc T; Baéza-Campone E; Bouillot PE; Clinquart A; Feidt C; Fourat E; Gautron J; Girard A; Guillier L; Kesse-Guyot E; Lebret B; Lefèvre F; Le Perchec S; Martin B; Mirade PS; Pierre F; Raulet M; Rémond D; Sans P; Souchon I; Donnars C; Santé-Lhoutellier V
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100376. PubMed ID: 34836809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: Factors affecting sheep carcass and meat quality attributes.
    Prache S; Schreurs N; Guillier L
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100330. PubMed ID: 34400114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review: Production factors affecting poultry carcass and meat quality attributes.
    Baéza E; Guillier L; Petracci M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100331. PubMed ID: 34419417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review: On-farm and processing factors affecting bovine carcass and meat quality.
    Clinquart A; Ellies-Oury MP; Hocquette JF; Guillier L; Santé-Lhoutellier V; Prache S
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100426. PubMed ID: 35031228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marinade injection of pork as a possible technological strategy to reduce boar taint: Response and attitude of the consumer.
    Peñaranda I; Egea M; Linares MB; López MB; Garrido MD
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jun; 212():109462. PubMed ID: 38402647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bacterial profile of pork from production to retail based on high-throughput sequencing.
    Kim Y; Ban GH; Hong YW; Jeong KC; Bae D; Kim SA
    Food Res Int; 2024 Jan; 176():113745. PubMed ID: 38163697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining pig genetic and feeding strategies improves the sensory, nutritional and technological quality of pork in the context of relocation of feed resources.
    Lebret B; Lhuisset S; Labussière E; Louveau I
    Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109074. PubMed ID: 36525917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
    Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construction of beef quality through official quality signs, the example of Label Rouge.
    Raulet M; Clinquart A; Prache S
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100357. PubMed ID: 34565706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of gross lesions and handling practices in pigs and their association with pork quality, Kiambu, Kenya.
    Sentamu DN; Onono JO; Muinde P; Bor N; Chepyatich D; Thomas LF
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272951. PubMed ID: 36026517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-slaughter, slaughter and post-slaughter practices of slaughterhouse workers in Southeast, Nigeria: Animal welfare, meat quality, food safety and public health implications.
    Njoga EO; Ilo SU; Nwobi OC; Onwumere-Idolor OS; Ajibo FE; Okoli CE; Jaja IF; Oguttu JW
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282418. PubMed ID: 36867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality.
    Faucitano L
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):728-738. PubMed ID: 29401265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)?
    Rocha LM; Velarde A; Dalmau A; Saucier L; Faucitano L
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jan; 94(1):359-76. PubMed ID: 26812341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Australian consumer preferences for fresh pork meat attributes: A best-worst approach on 46 attributes.
    Duong C; Sung B; Lee S; Easton J
    Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108954. PubMed ID: 36041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs.
    Lebret B
    Animal; 2008 Oct; 2(10):1548-58. PubMed ID: 22443914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer perception of entire male pork coated with spiced edible films as a new product to mask boar taint.
    Garrido MD; Egea M; Font-I-Furnols M; Linares MB; Peñaranda I
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jul; 201():109171. PubMed ID: 37003166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On-farm prevalence of and potential risk factors for boar taint.
    Heyrman E; Millet S; Tuyttens FAM; Ampe B; Janssens S; Buys N; Wauters J; Vanhaecke L; Aluwé M
    Animal; 2021 Mar; 15(3):100141. PubMed ID: 33573941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.