177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837133)
1. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei ZD; Zhang HL; Yang YS; Chen LQ
J Invest Surg; 2021 Sep; 34(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 32036710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs. Open Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Comparison.
Vincke A; Miftode S; Alfarawan F; Bockhorn M; El-Sourani N
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recurrence and Survival after Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer - A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.
Henckens SP; Schuring N; Elliott JA; Johar A; Markar SR; Gantxegi A; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Pera M; Reynolds JV; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS;
Ann Surg; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38577796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.
Mariette C; Markar S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Pezet D; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrere N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Bonnetain F; Piessen G;
Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 31404005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Hybrid laparoscopic thoracotomic esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis].
Hoeppner J; Marjanovic G; Glatz T; Kulemann B; Hopt UT
Chirurg; 2014 Jul; 85(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 25000930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Hoshino A; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Okada T; Matsui T; Yamaguchi K; Kawano T; Kinugasa Y
World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3829-3836. PubMed ID: 32591842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.
Giulini L; Nasser CA; Tank J; Papp M; Stein HJ; Dubecz A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 33448299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.
Bjelović M; Babič T; Gunjić D; Veselinović M; Špica B
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(7-8):410-5. PubMed ID: 26506750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group.
van der Wilk BJ; Hagens ERC; Eyck BM; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Nafteux P; Schröder W; Nilsson M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lagarde SM; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 35024794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nuytens F; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Gagnière J; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Markar SR; Piessen G;
JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 33595631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
