127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837254)
1. Image retrieval-based parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.
Padilla A; Arponen O; Rinta-Kiikka I; Pertuz S
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34837254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
Kontos D; Winham SJ; Oustimov A; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Gastounioti A; Whaley DH; Hruska CB; Kerlikowske K; Brandt K; Conant EF; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30375931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of a fully-automated parenchymal analysis software for breast cancer risk assessment: A pilot study in a Finnish sample.
Pertuz S; Sassi A; Holli-Helenius K; Kämäräinen J; Rinta-Kiikka I; Lääperi AL; Arponen O
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108710. PubMed ID: 31689665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Field cancerization in the understanding of parenchymal analysis of mammograms for breast cancer risk assessment.
Miranda DA; Pertuz S
Med Hypotheses; 2020 Mar; 136():109511. PubMed ID: 31837523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.
Li H; Mendel KR; Lan L; Sheth D; Giger ML
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 30747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Hsieh MK; Pantalone L; Conant EF; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):977-984. PubMed ID: 29395798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Mammographic Systems Affect the Performance of Computerized Parenchymal Analysis?
Pertuz S; Sassi A; Arponen O; Holli-Helenius K; Laaperi AL; Rinta-Kiikka I
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4863-4866. PubMed ID: 31946950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density.
Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell E; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():S47-55. PubMed ID: 10866036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.
Arefan D; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31667873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
