These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837276)
1. Effect of Different Preparation Depths for an Inlay-Retained Fixed Partial Denture on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. Khaled M; Sabet A; Ebeid K; Salah T J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):601-605. PubMed ID: 34837276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Preparation Type and Tooth Geometry on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners. Ashraf Y; Sabet A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):800-804. PubMed ID: 32406156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: An In Vitro Study. Zhang XY; Cao Y; Hu ZW; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun YC Chin J Dent Res; 2022 Sep; 25(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 36102891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws]. Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different span lengths with different total occlusal convergences on the accuracy of intraoral scanners. Yehia A; Abo El Fadl A; El Sergany O; Ebeid K J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 36988154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation. Kim JH; Son SA; Lee H; Yoo YJ; Hong SJ; Park JK J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 34608739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line]. Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs. Park Y; Kim JH; Park JK; Son SA BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):515. PubMed ID: 37488581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro. Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation. Abduo J; Laskey D J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 36415928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method. Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]