These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837276)
21. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method. Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of different preparation designs of minimally invasive occlusal onlays on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Ashraf K; Ebeid K; Salah T J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38053453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study. Gurpinar B; Tak O J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis. Ashraf Y; Abo El Fadl A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 37310208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of different intraoral scanners and post-space depths on the trueness of digital impressions. Emam M; Ghanem L; Abdel Sadek HM Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 37070711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners and a conventional impression: an in vivo clinical study. Jorquera GJ; Sampaio CS; Bozzalla A; Hirata R; Sánchez JP Quintessence Int; 2021 Oct; 52(10):904-910. PubMed ID: 34410071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Elter B; Tak Ö J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Li H; Yamada S; Matsuoka T; Ono S; Nakano T J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 33829613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative analysis of intraoral scanners accuracy using 3D software: an in vivo study. Pellitteri F; Albertini P; Vogrig A; Spedicato GA; Siciliani G; Lombardo L Prog Orthod; 2022 Jul; 23(1):21. PubMed ID: 35781850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models with Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva. Song J; Kim M Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2920804. PubMed ID: 32185200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of four intraoral scanners with 70% reduced inlay and four-unit bridge models of international standard. Uhm SH; Kim JH; Jiang HB; Woo CW; Chang M; Kim KN; Bae JM; Oh S Dent Mater J; 2017 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 27928099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of different inlay configurations and distance from the adjacent tooth on the accuracy of an intraoral scan. Son SA; Kim JH; Seo DG; Park JK J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):680-687. PubMed ID: 33712313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]