These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837587)

  • 1. Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Kan IP; Pizzonia KL; Drummey AB; Mikkelsen EJV
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Nov; 6(1):76. PubMed ID: 34837587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The rational continued influence of misinformation.
    Connor Desai SA; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104453. PubMed ID: 33011527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to misinformation retractions in the continued influence paradigm: Evidence for stability.
    McIlhiney P; Gignac GE; Weinborn M; Ecker UK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jul; 75(7):1259-1271. PubMed ID: 34541938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scrolling through fake news: The effect of presentation order on misinformation retention.
    Edelijn Y; Øvreeide VD; Verheyen S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Mar; 30(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 37227873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 34533754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.
    Sanderson JA; Farrell S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271566. PubMed ID: 35849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective correction of misinformation.
    Prike T; Ecker UKH
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2023 Dec; 54():101712. PubMed ID: 37944323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the use of open and closed questions for Web-based measures of the continued-influence effect.
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1426-1440. PubMed ID: 29943224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continued influence of misinformation in times of COVID-19.
    van Huijstee D; Vermeulen I; Kerkhof P; Droog E
    Int J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 57(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 34448200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stopping healthcare misinformation: The effect of financial incentives and legislation.
    Au CH; Ho KKW; Chiu DKW
    Health Policy; 2021 May; 125(5):627-633. PubMed ID: 33712320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do forewarnings and post-warnings affect misinformation reliance? The impact of warnings on the continued influence effect and belief regression.
    Buczel KA; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38261249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):422-436. PubMed ID: 36125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Tang DT
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1087-100. PubMed ID: 21156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fake news, influencers and health-related professional participation on the Web: A pilot study on a social-network of people with Multiple Sclerosis.
    Lavorgna L; De Stefano M; Sparaco M; Moccia M; Abbadessa G; Montella P; Buonanno D; Esposito S; Clerico M; Cenci C; Trojsi F; Lanzillo R; Rosa L; Morra VB; Ippolito D; Maniscalco G; Bisecco A; Tedeschi G; Bonavita S
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Oct; 25():175-178. PubMed ID: 30096683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
    Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.