159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837596)
1. Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.
He J; Li D; Shen P; Liang W; Kang S; Zhang Y; Zhao H; Liu M; Wang X; Lin Z; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 27(3):619-625. PubMed ID: 34837596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
Liu P; Lin L; Kong Y; Huo Z; Zhu L; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32138718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical adenosquamous carcinoma at stage IA2 to IIA2: A multicenter retrospective study.
Teng X; Kang S; Li W; Ding H; Ling B; Zhu L; Wang D; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1592-1610. PubMed ID: 36919234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).
Chen X; Liang W; Duan H; Wu M; Zhan X; Dai E; Lv Q; Xie Q; Liu R; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():800049. PubMed ID: 35494051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14-year multicenter study.
Ye Y; Zhang G; Li Z; Chen B; Zhao H; Yang Y; Wang L; Yao J; Chen X; Huang Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Cancer Med; 2023 Oct; 12(19):19617-19632. PubMed ID: 37768092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 （LVSI
Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors.
Ye Y; Li Z; Kang S; Yang Y; Ling B; Wang L; Yao J; Li P; Wang X; Gong S; Fan H; Kong Y; Cao Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2023 May; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 37161372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Wang W; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1331. PubMed ID: 31828044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery due to lack of radiotherapy equipment: A retrospective comparison with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Zeng J; Sun P; Ping Q; Jiang S; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0266001. PubMed ID: 35324998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
