510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34837960)
1. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention.
Storman D; Koperny M; Zając J; Polak M; Weglarz P; Bochenek-Cibor J; Swierz MJ; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach AA; Kaluzinska K; Bała MM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centers.
Gates M; Gates A; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():9-15. PubMed ID: 32416337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2.
Perry R; Whitmarsh A; Leach V; Davies P
Syst Rev; 2021 Oct; 10(1):273. PubMed ID: 34696810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability.
Banzi R; Cinquini M; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Pecoraro V; Capobussi M; Minozzi S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():24-32. PubMed ID: 29526556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies.
Pieper D; Puljak L; González-Lorenzo M; Minozzi S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():26-33. PubMed ID: 30543911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement - a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools.
Bühn S; Ober P; Mathes T; Wegewitz U; Jacobs A; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 33706710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists.
Jaca A; Ndze VN; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2824-2835. PubMed ID: 31348722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool.
Lorenz RC; Matthias K; Pieper D; Wegewitz U; Morche J; Nocon M; Rissling O; Schirm J; Jacobs A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():133-140. PubMed ID: 31152864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are systematic reviews addressing nutrition for cancer prevention trustworthy? A systematic survey of quality and risk of bias.
Zajac JF; Storman D; Swierz MJ; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
Nutr Rev; 2022 May; 80(6):1558-1567. PubMed ID: 34921318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews of the local management of anogenital warts: a systematic review using AMSTAR II, ROBIS and PRISMA.
Desmoulin A; Joly E; Tran P; Derancourt C; Bertolotti A
Sex Transm Infect; 2023 Aug; 99(5):345-347. PubMed ID: 36948589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Alcalde-Mellado P; Maestre-López B; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():79-88. PubMed ID: 28893571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses published in the field of bariatrics: A cross-sectional systematic survey using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS.
Storman M; Storman D; Jasinska KW; Swierz MJ; Bala MM
Obes Rev; 2020 May; 21(5):e12994. PubMed ID: 31997545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews.
Zhong D; Xiao Q; Xiao X; Li Y; Ye J; Xia L; Zhang C; Li J; Zheng H; Jin R
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov; 63(6):505-517. PubMed ID: 31981834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of systematic reviews on timing of complementary feeding for early childhood allergy prevention.
Matterne U; Theurich MA; Pröbstl S; Pieper D; Wang J; Xu A; Apfelbacher C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):80. PubMed ID: 37016313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
