These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34838350)

  • 1. Reply to Wei Zhang So, Ziting Wang, and Ho Yee Tiong's Letter to the Editor re: Anna Lantz, David Bock, Olof Akre, et al. Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up. Eur Urol 2021;80:650-60.
    Lantz A; Bock D; Akre O; Angenete E; Bjartell A; Carlsson S; Koss Modig K; Nyberg M; Stinesen Kollberg K; Steineck G; Stranne J; Wiklund P; Haglind E
    Eur Urol; 2022 Feb; 81(2):e43. PubMed ID: 34838350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Anna Lantz, David Bock, Olof Akre, et al. Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up. Eur Urol 2021;80:650-60.
    So WZ; Wang Z; Tiong HY
    Eur Urol; 2022 Feb; 81(2):e41-e42. PubMed ID: 34823900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply to Michael Froehner and Manfred P. Wirth's letter to the editor re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Giacomo Novara, Raymond C. Rosen, et al. systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:405-17.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Mottrie A; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):e39-40. PubMed ID: 23201467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up.
    Lantz A; Bock D; Akre O; Angenete E; Bjartell A; Carlsson S; Modig KK; Nyberg M; Kollberg KS; Steineck G; Stranne J; Wiklund P; Haglind E
    Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):650-660. PubMed ID: 34538508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reply to Stefano C.M. Picozzi, Cristian Ricci and Luca Carmignani's letter to the editor re: Giacomo Novara, Vincenzo Ficarra, Simone Mocellin, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:382-404.
    Novara G; Ficarra V
    Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):e29-31. PubMed ID: 23218764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Giacomo Novara, Raymond C. Rosen, et al. systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:405-17.
    Froehner M; Wirth MP
    Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):e38. PubMed ID: 23201470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.
    Koo KC; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 24661241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Christoph Würnschimmel, Markus Graefen, Alberto Briganti, and Hartwig Huland's Letter to the Editor re: Paolo Afonso de Carvalho, Joāo A.B.A. Barbosa, Giuliano B. Guglielmetti, et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2020;77:628-35. Incredible Results for Robot-assisted Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Patel V
    Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):e50-e51. PubMed ID: 33334623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reply to Robert P. Myers' letter to the editor re: Francesco Montorsi, Timothy G. Wilson, Raymond C. Rosen, et al. best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena consensus panel. Eur Urol 2012;62:368-81.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Mottrie A; Wilson TG; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):e42-3. PubMed ID: 23253772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?
    Lim SK; Kim KH; Shin TY; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 23106163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Christoph Würnschimmel, Markus Graefen, Alberto Briganti, and Hartwig Huland's Letter to the Editor re: Paolo Afonso de Carvalho, João A.B.A. Barbosa, Giuliano B. Guglielmetti, et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2020;77:628-35. Incredible Results for Robot-assisted Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients: Rio de Janeiro is Still Beautiful.
    Ferreira Coelho R; Afonso de Carvalho P; Betoni Guglielmetti G; Dener Cordeiro M; Carlos Nahas W
    Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):e47-e49. PubMed ID: 33162248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: K.R. Seetharam Bhat, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Marco Sandri, et al. Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.005: Salvage Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrence After Focal Therapy-The Truth and Consequences.
    Patel V; Bhat KRS; Moschovas MC; Noel J; Rogers T
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1864. PubMed ID: 35219650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Addendum concerning: "A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre: Oncologic and functional outcomes" written by J.B. Beauval et al. [Prog. Urol. 25 (2015) 370-8] and F. Rozet [Prog. Urol. 25 (2015) 379-80]].
    Barré C; Nguyen JM
    Prog Urol; 2016 May; 26(6):383-4. PubMed ID: 27130521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re: Lorenzo Marconi, Thomas Stonier, Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa, et al. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Therapy: Oncological, Functional Outcomes and Predictors of Recurrence. Eur Urol 2019;76:27-30: Salvage Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Focal Therapy.
    Marra G; Van Velthoven R; Valerio M
    Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):e103-e104. PubMed ID: 31607392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reply to Fabrizio Dal Moro's Letter to the Editor re: Vladimir Student Jr., Ales Vidlar, Michal Grepl, Igor Hartmann, Eva Buresova, Vladimir Student. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2017;71:822-30: CoRPUS and ARVUS.
    Student V; Student V
    Eur Urol; 2017 Oct; 72(4):e97. PubMed ID: 28527811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.
    Yaxley JW; Coughlin GD; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Dunglison N; Carter R; Williams S; Payton DJ; Perry-Keene J; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet; 2016 Sep; 388(10049):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 27474375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reply to Shangqing Ren, Xu Hu, Kai Wang, Qian Lv, and Wang Dong's Letter to the Editor re: Jihad H. Kaouk, Ethan L. Ferguson, Alp Tuna Beksac, et al. Single-port Robotic Transvesical Partial Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Initial Series and Description of Technique. Eur Urol. 2022;82:551-58.
    Ferguson EL; Kaouk JH
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jan; 83(1):e26-e27. PubMed ID: 36280499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.
    Koizumi A; Narita S; Nara T; Takayama K; Kanda S; Numakura K; Tsuruta H; Maeno A; Huang M; Saito M; Inoue T; Tsuchiya N; Satoh S; Nanjo H; Habuchi T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29931077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reply to Michael Froehner, Manfred P. Wirth's letter to the editor re: Jim C. Hu, Giorgio Gandaglia, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control. Eur Urol 2014;66:666-72.
    Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):e86. PubMed ID: 24882671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: Paolo Afonso de Carvalho, Joāo A.B.A. Barbosa, Giuliano B. Guglielmetti, et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2020;77:628-35: Incredible Results for Robot-assisted Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Montorsi F; Gandaglia G; Würnschimmel C; Graefen M; Briganti A; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):e44-e46. PubMed ID: 33067018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.