These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34839529)

  • 1. Examining Insensitivity to Probability in Evidence-Based Communication of Relative Risks: The Role of Affect and Communication Format.
    Heard CL; Rakow T
    Risk Anal; 2022 Oct; 42(10):2145-2159. PubMed ID: 34839529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
    Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Too Worried to Judge: On the Role of Perceived Severity in Medical Decision-Making.
    Colomé À; Rodríguez-Ferreiro J; Tubau E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1906. PubMed ID: 30356743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences.
    Dolan JG; Iadarola S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Apr; 8():14. PubMed ID: 18402680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
    Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of prognostic data presentation format on perceived risk among surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chapman AR; Litton E; Chamberlain J; Ho KM
    J Crit Care; 2015 Apr; 30(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 25480457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating risk: How relevant and irrelevant probabilistic information influences risk perception in medical decision-making.
    Hayakawa S; Marian V
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):678-690. PubMed ID: 36539559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.
    Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W; Wilkins AM; Boker EM; MacDonald Gibson J
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):612-628. PubMed ID: 27862121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of graphical and numerical presentation of hypothetical prenatal diagnosis results on risk perception.
    Siegrist M; Orlow P; Keller C
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):567-74. PubMed ID: 18566487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Communicating uncertainty in national security intelligence: Expert and nonexpert interpretations of and preferences for verbal and numeric formats.
    Irwin D; Mandel DR
    Risk Anal; 2023 May; 43(5):943-957. PubMed ID: 35994518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A
    Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling.
    Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L; van Asperen CJ; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Timmermans DR
    BMC Cancer; 2008 Oct; 8():283. PubMed ID: 18834503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.