BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34841933)

  • 1. In Search of Salience: Focus Detection in the Speech of Different Talkers.
    Ip MHK; Cutler A
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):650-680. PubMed ID: 34841933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universals of listening: Equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages.
    Ip MHK; Cutler A
    Cognition; 2020 Sep; 202():104311. PubMed ID: 32502869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.
    Baek H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):158. PubMed ID: 35105020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phrase Lengths and the Perceived Informativeness of Prosodic Cues in Turkish.
    Dinçtopal Deniz N; Fodor JD
    Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):505-529. PubMed ID: 29216811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Encoding and decoding of meaning through structured variability in intonational speech prosody.
    Xie X; Buxó-Lugo A; Kurumada C
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104619. PubMed ID: 33601018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers.
    Chrabaszcz A; Winn M; Lin CY; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1468-79. PubMed ID: 24686836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Listeners track talker-specific prosody to deal with talker-variability.
    Severijnen GGA; Bosker HR; Piai V; McQueen JM
    Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1769():147605. PubMed ID: 34363790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intonational Structure Influences Perception of Contrastive Vowel Length: The Case of Phrase-Final Lengthening in Tokyo Japanese.
    Steffman J; Katsuda H
    Lang Speech; 2021 Dec; 64(4):839-858. PubMed ID: 33251945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faces with foreign accents: An event-related potential study of accented sentence comprehension.
    Grey S; Cosgrove AL; van Hell JG
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Oct; 147():107575. PubMed ID: 32738253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interdependence of tonal and durational cues in the perception of rhythmic groups.
    Cumming RE
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(4):219-42. PubMed ID: 21525778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitation of processing
    Tamaoka K; Ji Y
    Phonetica; 2022 Mar; 79(1):45-75. PubMed ID: 35320639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual Differences in Early Disambiguation of Prosodic Grouping.
    Hansen M; Huttenlauch C; de Beer C; Wartenburger I; Hanne S
    Lang Speech; 2023 Sep; 66(3):706-733. PubMed ID: 36250333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tonal cues to prosodic structure in rate-dependent speech perception.
    Steffman J; Jun SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3825. PubMed ID: 34852588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of prosodic boundaries on comprehension of spoken English sentences.
    Blasko DG; Hall MD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 9760620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When "okay" is not okay: acoustic characteristics of single-word prosody conveying reluctance.
    van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL13-9. PubMed ID: 23298012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.