These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34841940)

  • 1. A heuristic model for cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal dysplasia.
    Khandelwal M; Ramaiah PT; Setty S; Subramonia S; Kapoor S; Karajagi S
    J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 34841940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
    Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
    Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on various cephalometric measurements.
    Han UK; Kim YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 May; 113(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 9598612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of cervicovertebral morphology in different sagittal skeletal growth patterns.
    Baydaş B; Yavuz I; Durna N; Ceylan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14994881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between cranial mechanics and dysmorphic dentofacial characteristics: a cross-sectional study.
    Fournier-Bourgier S; Fournier R; Garet M; Feval P; Gebeile-Chauty S
    Cranio; 2016 Jan; 34(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 25390737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between severity of dentofacial deformity and motivation for orthodontic-orthognathic surgery treatment.
    Wilmot JJ; Barber HD; Chou DG; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 8297053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach.
    Anderson G; Fields HW; Beck M; Chacon G; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16808567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II : Cephalometric and tensor analysis.
    Schulz S; Koos B; Duske K; Stahl F
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):420-431. PubMed ID: 27752709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.