These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34842779)

  • 1. Progress toward SHAPE Constrained Computational Prediction of Tertiary Interactions in RNA Structure.
    De Bisschop G; Allouche D; Frezza E; Masquida B; Ponty Y; Will S; Sargueil B
    Noncoding RNA; 2021 Nov; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34842779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling, including pseudoknots.
    Hajdin CE; Bellaousov S; Huggins W; Leonard CW; Mathews DH; Weeks KM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Apr; 110(14):5498-503. PubMed ID: 23503844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct identification of base-paired RNA nucleotides by correlated chemical probing.
    Krokhotin A; Mustoe AM; Weeks KM; Dokholyan NV
    RNA; 2017 Jan; 23(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 27803152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. RNA secondary structure modeling at consistent high accuracy using differential SHAPE.
    Rice GM; Leonard CW; Weeks KM
    RNA; 2014 Jun; 20(6):846-54. PubMed ID: 24742934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An iterated loop matching approach to the prediction of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots.
    Ruan J; Stormo GD; Zhang W
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 14693809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermodynamic heuristics with case-based reasoning: combined insights for RNA pseudoknot secondary structure.
    Al-Khatib RM; Rashid NA; Abdullah R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Aug; 29(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 21696223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping RNA Structure In Vitro with SHAPE Chemistry and Next-Generation Sequencing (SHAPE-Seq).
    Watters KE; Lucks JB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1490():135-62. PubMed ID: 27665597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pair stochastic tree adjoining grammars for aligning and predicting pseudoknot RNA structures.
    Matsui H; Sato K; Sakakibara Y
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():290-9. PubMed ID: 16448022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. IPknot: fast and accurate prediction of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots using integer programming.
    Sato K; Kato Y; Hamada M; Akutsu T; Asai K
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(13):i85-93. PubMed ID: 21685106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design, implementation and evaluation of a practical pseudoknot folding algorithm based on thermodynamics.
    Reeder J; Giegerich R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():104. PubMed ID: 15294028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying complete RNA structural ensembles including pseudoknots.
    Gupta A; Rahman R; Li K; Gribskov M
    RNA Biol; 2012 Feb; 9(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 22418849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards 3D structure prediction of large RNA molecules: an integer programming framework to insert local 3D motifs in RNA secondary structure.
    Reinharz V; Major F; Waldispühl J
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):i207-14. PubMed ID: 22689763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Base pair probability estimates improve the prediction accuracy of RNA non-canonical base pairs.
    Sloma MF; Mathews DH
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005827. PubMed ID: 29107980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RNA pseudoknot prediction in energy-based models.
    Lyngsø RB; Pedersen CN
    J Comput Biol; 2000; 7(3-4):409-27. PubMed ID: 11108471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conformational features of topologically classified RNA secondary structures.
    Chiu JK; Chen YP
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e39907. PubMed ID: 22792195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interplay between molecular flexibility and RNA chemical probing reactivities analyzed at the nucleotide level via an extensive molecular dynamics study.
    Frezza E; Courban A; Allouche D; Sargueil B; Pasquali S
    Methods; 2019 Jun; 162-163():108-127. PubMed ID: 31145972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The 5S rRNA loop E: chemical probing and phylogenetic data versus crystal structure.
    Leontis NB; Westhof E
    RNA; 1998 Sep; 4(9):1134-53. PubMed ID: 9740131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling RNA secondary structure folding ensembles using SHAPE mapping data.
    Spasic A; Assmann SM; Bevilacqua PC; Mathews DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(1):314-323. PubMed ID: 29177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate prediction of RNA nucleotide interactions with backbone k-tree model.
    Ding L; Xue X; LaMarca S; Mohebbi M; Samad A; Malmberg RL; Cai L
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2660-7. PubMed ID: 25886978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.