These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843243)

  • 1. Relative Binding Free-Energy Calculations at Lipid-Exposed Sites: Deciphering Hot Spots.
    Dickson CJ; Hornak V; Duca JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):5923-5930. PubMed ID: 34843243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Different Automated Binding Pose Generation Approaches on Relative Binding Free Energy Simulations.
    Cappel D; Jerome S; Hessler G; Matter H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 31986249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the Lipid Bilayer Orchestrate Access and Binding of Ligands to Transmembrane Orthosteric/Allosteric Sites of G Protein-Coupled Receptors?
    Szlenk CT; Gc JB; Natesan S
    Mol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 96(5):527-541. PubMed ID: 30967440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity in Binding Free Energies Due to Protein Reorganization.
    Lim NM; Wang L; Abel R; Mobley DL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Sep; 12(9):4620-31. PubMed ID: 27462935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Predictive Power of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Test Cases Involving Displacement of Binding Site Water Molecules.
    Wahl J; Smieško M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Feb; 59(2):754-765. PubMed ID: 30640456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvements in Precision of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Afforded by the Alchemical Enhanced Sampling (ACES) Approach.
    Tsai HC; Xu J; Guo Z; Yi Y; Tian C; Que X; Giese T; Lee TS; York DM; Ganguly A; Pan A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Sep; 64(18):7046-7055. PubMed ID: 39225694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Broadening the Scope of Binding Free Energy Calculations Using a Separated Topologies Approach.
    Baumann HM; Dybeck E; McClendon CL; Pickard FC; Gapsys V; Pérez-Benito L; Hahn DF; Tresadern G; Mathiowetz AM; Mobley DL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):5058-5076. PubMed ID: 37487138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.
    Aldeghi M; Bodkin MJ; Knapp S; Biggin PC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2203-2221. PubMed ID: 28786670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving
    McNutt AT; Koes DR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Apr; 62(8):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 35380443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Ligands with Diverse Scaffolds with the Alchemical Transfer Method.
    Azimi S; Khuttan S; Wu JZ; Pal RK; Gallicchio E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jan; 62(2):309-323. PubMed ID: 34990555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of Alchemical Free Energy Methods in Drug Discovery.
    Song LF; Merz KM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5308-5318. PubMed ID: 32818371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative Binding Free Energy between Chemically Distant Compounds Using a Bidirectional Nonequilibrium Approach.
    Procacci P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):4014-4026. PubMed ID: 35642423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Molecular Mechanism Underlying Ligand Binding to the Membrane-Embedded Site of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor.
    Yuan X; Raniolo S; Limongelli V; Xu Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 May; 14(5):2761-2770. PubMed ID: 29660291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate Prediction of GPCR Ligand Binding Affinity with Free Energy Perturbation.
    Deflorian F; Perez-Benito L; Lenselink EB; Congreve M; van Vlijmen HWT; Mason JS; Graaf C; Tresadern G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5563-5579. PubMed ID: 32539374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations?
    Liu S; Wang L; Mobley DL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25835054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping the druggable allosteric space of G-protein coupled receptors: a fragment-based molecular dynamics approach.
    Ivetac A; McCammon JA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Sep; 76(3):201-17. PubMed ID: 20626410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Role of Lipids in Allosteric Modulation of Dopamine D
    Żuk J; Bartuzi D; Miszta P; Kaczor AA
    Molecules; 2022 Feb; 27(4):. PubMed ID: 35209123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.