These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34843303)

  • 1. When a lack of passion intertwines with thought and action: Neutral feelings about COVID-19 are associated with U.S. presidential candidate attitudes and voting behavior.
    Park HJ; Hu D; Haynes E; Gasper K
    Emotion; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1796-1800. PubMed ID: 34843303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Politics v. science: How President Trump's war on science impacted public health and environmental regulation.
    Webb RM; Kurtz L
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2022; 188(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 35168747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. (Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections.
    Ward G; De Neve JE; Ungar LH; Eichstaedt JC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):370-383. PubMed ID: 32700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Did the COVID-19 pandemic help or hurt Donald Trump's political fortunes?
    Hart J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247664. PubMed ID: 33626568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.
    Baccini L; Brodeur A; Weymouth S
    J Popul Econ; 2021; 34(2):739-767. PubMed ID: 33469244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensions of pathological narcissism and intention to vote for Donald Trump.
    Yalch MM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249892. PubMed ID: 33857206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Bor J
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 107(10):1560-1562. PubMed ID: 28817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Did Covid-19 Kill Trump Politically? The Pandemic and Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Clarke H; Stewart MC; Ho K
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Sep; 102(5):2194-2209. PubMed ID: 34226770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.
    Algara C; Amlani S; Collitt S; Hale I; Kazemian S
    Polit Behav; 2022 Oct; ():1-29. PubMed ID: 36311381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: Variation in Regional Political Preferences Predicted New Prescriptions after President Trump's Endorsement.
    Madanay F; McDevitt RC; Ubel PA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2022 Aug; 47(4):429-451. PubMed ID: 35044458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout.
    Aggarwal M; Allen J; Coppock A; Frankowski D; Messing S; Zhang K; Barnes J; Beasley A; Hantman H; Zheng S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Mar; 7(3):332-341. PubMed ID: 36635584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. House Republicans were rewarded for supporting Donald Trump's 'stop the steal' efforts.
    Bartels LM; Carnes N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Aug; 120(34):e2309072120. PubMed ID: 37579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How perceived polarization predicts attitude moralization (and vice versa): A four-wave longitudinal study during the 2020 U.S. election.
    D'Amore C; van Zomeren M; Koudenburg N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Apr; 126(4):624-642. PubMed ID: 38386365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local demographic changes and US presidential voting, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(50):25023-25028. PubMed ID: 31744870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.